Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: ndt

I don't understand what you mean by an amendment that states what my goals are.

Also, you have evidently chosen to ignore, and I've seen this many times before, that regardless what Justice Black wanted everybody to think about Jefferson's "wall of separation" that Jefferson had actually acknowledged that the Founders wrote the 1st and 10th Amendments in part to delegate government power to legislate religion uniquely to the state governments. But this is not surprising if you are aware that the states had this power long before they established the federal government and its Constitution.

As I've stated elsewhere, the people need to get a grip on what the honest interpretations of the 1st, 10th and 14th Amendments actually say about their religious freedoms. Then, when the people wise up to the fact that they are essentially prisoners of conscious to bogus interpretation of the establishment clause by a renegade, anti-religious expression Supreme Court, they will hopefully heed Lincoln's advice for dealing with crooked judges:

"We the People are the rightful master of both congress and the courts - not to overthrow the Constitution, but to overthrow the men who pervert the Constitution." --Abraham Lincoln, Political debates between Lincoln and Douglas, 1858.


31 posted on 08/26/2006 11:59:48 PM PDT by Amendment10
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies ]


To: Amendment10
"Also, you have evidently chosen to ignore..."

I have ignored nothing that have written. Other than asking me if I read your other posts, you did not ask a single question. Just because I choose not to fall to may knees and praise you for your genius does not mean I did not hear you.

"I don't understand what you mean by an amendment that states what my goals are."

I on the other had have asked a pointed question 3 time now and you have not even attempted an answer, instead claiming you do not understand the question that was already posed you you in 3 different ways. Let me try it as a request instead.

My GOAL: So that I may understand exactly your position on how freedom of religion / wall of separation issues should be interpreted.

My REQUEST: Please provide me with the text of a proposal for a Constitutional Amendment that is sufficiently explicit in it language as to be beyond misinterpretation by the judiciary.
37 posted on 08/27/2006 9:31:13 AM PDT by ndt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson