Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Vague disquiet roils voters in Missouri race
Washington Times ^ | August 26, 2006 | Christina Bellantoni

Posted on 08/26/2006 3:17:58 PM PDT by FreeKeys

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-76 next last
This editorial looks like it was posted in the WashTime's news section for some reason. I don't particularly like it; I'm just posting it to see if we can come up with some good ideas for Jim Talent's campaign anyway.
1 posted on 08/26/2006 3:18:02 PM PDT by FreeKeys
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: FreeKeys

Didn't they elect a corpse to the Senate a few years ago?


2 posted on 08/26/2006 3:27:21 PM PDT by operation clinton cleanup (Assistant to the traveling secretary.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: operation clinton cleanup
He barely beat Carnahan.
3 posted on 08/26/2006 3:29:16 PM PDT by Perdogg (Democrats = terrorists)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: FreeKeys
After observing Mr. Talent earlier this month at the Governor's Ham Breakfast at the Missouri State Fair, he said he is likely to base his vote on the price of gas come Nov. 7.

LOL, and Talent has control over the price of gas how?? You mean to tell me this idiot will vote for a Democrat who comes from the party that is largely responsible for gas prices being so high with the Clinton era cleaning burning fuel mandates that created 30 different fuel blends, Democrats who regulated refinery building out of existence decades ago and Democrats who constantly resist drilling in ANWR and increasing domestic production elsewhere??? Sure idiot, vote for Bill Clinton's candidate, McCaskill, the same Bill Clinton who vetoed ANWR drilling in 1996 which if he had not the price of gas would be 50 cents a gallon cheaper now.

God, if this is the kind of idiocy out there in the country right now, I give up. Voting based on the price of gas, and for the party which would weaken us in the war on terror. Brilliant. People like this dummy shouldn't even be allowed to vote.

4 posted on 08/26/2006 3:33:32 PM PDT by MikeA (Not voting out of anger in November is a vote for Nancy Pelosi as Speaker of the House)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FreeKeys

"I'm just posting it to see if we can come up with some good ideas for Jim Talent's campaign anyway."

Ban m-fund, hedge fund, and indexed investing in the oil futures market.


5 posted on 08/26/2006 3:36:21 PM PDT by Shermy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FreeKeys

IMHO, the real reason she's competitive is that she's running as a
"tougher-than-Talent" anti-illegal immigration Democrat.

Purely Clintonian. And might sucker enough of the mushy-middle to win.


6 posted on 08/26/2006 3:41:04 PM PDT by VOA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FreeKeys
..... he said he is likely to base his vote on the price of gas come Nov. 7.

Cool. In the last two weeks the price of gas here outside of KC has gone fron 2.89 two weeks ago to 2.64 today

7 posted on 08/26/2006 3:48:21 PM PDT by barker (Some days are diamonds, some days are stones.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: barker

You may have seen this interview of McCaskill:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9e9_S59KgT8


8 posted on 08/26/2006 3:53:52 PM PDT by Ben Hecks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: FreeKeys

I think the rats are getting very nervous...they are going to be useing the MSM and anything else they can get their hands on to try and swing the voters their way....we just have to read between the lines....

Don't believe everything you read.....


9 posted on 08/26/2006 4:00:44 PM PDT by HarleyLady27 (My ? to libs: "Do they ever shut up on your planet?" "Grow your own DOPE: Plant a LIB!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Shermy
Ban m-fund, hedge fund, and indexed investing in the oil futures market.

Hmmmm. I don't think if Talent said it that too many people would understand it. They might even think he was trying to be an effete snob, talking over their heads.

How about if he said something like Thomas Sowell did -- (See: "Those who supply oil are being denounced and demonized by those who have been blocking the supply of oil." HERE-and HERE).

...or like Ben Stein did: "The oil companies do not come even remotely close to setting the price of oil and gasoline. ...  The largest oil company in the U.S. (a piker compared with many foreign companies) controls less than 3 percent of the world's oil. Does that offer a clue on how prices get set?" -- Ben Stein


10 posted on 08/26/2006 4:04:51 PM PDT by FreeKeys ("America's national security is the lowest priority on the Democratic Party agenda."- David Horowitz)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: FreeKeys

The major problem with punishing Republicans in this election, is that there is no viable alternative. Dem'crats are even MORE venal when they get into office, and whatever they are representing, it is certainly not the interests of the majority of Americans, whether it be the best interests, or blatant self-interests, of their constituents.

For the Dem'crat officeholders themselves, they make the very best they can of their opportunities to maximize personal gain and perpetuating themselves in office. That means pandering to the big-money interests even more shamelessly than some of the more liberal Republicans, at the expense of the people who elected them in the first place.

An elected official who is on the take has totally abandoned whatever claim he (or she) may have had for EVER being considered a conservative. So by definition, the acceptance of bribes in exchange for political favor becomes the default liberal position.

It is pretty much up to liberals to prove this is not so. "Principled" and "liberal" just do not come in the same breath. And can no longer be applied to a single individual, certainly not within the Dem'crat party.


11 posted on 08/26/2006 4:05:33 PM PDT by alloysteel (When in doubt, forge ahead anyway. To outsiders, it looks the same as boldness. Or plain crazy.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: barker
Cool. In the last two weeks the price of gas here outside of KC has gone fron 2.89 two weeks ago to 2.64 today

Here, too, in North Saint Louis County..

12 posted on 08/26/2006 4:08:14 PM PDT by cardinal4 (America, despite the usual suspects, stands firmly with Israel..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: MikeA
God, if this is the kind of idiocy out there in the country right now, I give up. Voting based on the price of gas, and for the party which would weaken us in the war on terror. Brilliant. People like this dummy shouldn't even be allowed to vote.

It does get rather depressing when you look at large cross-sections of the electorate, doesn't it? I wonder if even, God forbid, a nuclear attack on American soil would wake up some of these idiots. They would blame Bush and America for bringing it on themselves.

13 posted on 08/26/2006 4:11:10 PM PDT by Uncle Vlad (You cannot protect the peoples' civil liberties if you refuse to protect the people.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Ben Hecks

Had seen that.

Found this on Wikipedia:

McCaskill was previously married to David Exposito, with whom she had three children. The couple divorced in 1995, barely one year after Exposito was arrested on a Kansas City-area gambling boat for possession of marijuana. The incident and subsequent divorce occurred while McCaskill was Jackson County Prosecutor. Exposito was found murdered in Kansas City, Kansas on December 12, 2005; although no arrests have been made, prosecutors believe that the murder was drug-related.

Remembered that and I think there was something about a shady deal of his involving a golf driving range.


14 posted on 08/26/2006 4:17:30 PM PDT by barker (Some days are diamonds, some days are stones.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: MikeA
God, if this is the kind of idiocy out there in the country right now, I give up.

Stay strong bro. MSM flysheets like this article serve two propaganda purposes; to boost the Dems hopes and to suppress Republican turnout. Don't buy into it.

15 posted on 08/26/2006 4:34:31 PM PDT by 6SJ7
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: FreeKeys

History—In the 2004 state elections in California we had four state wide propositions that had a 67% favorable rating when they first came out. Then the democrats started the lies in their advertising. The lies were incredible that I thought, “No will ever believe these lies” but they did and all four propositions lost by about 60 %. The democrats learned a lot from that election and we will face the same thing from now on forward


16 posted on 08/26/2006 4:45:52 PM PDT by arnoldc1 (University of Southern California #1)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FreeKeys

I'm not sure just what the purpose of the article is but I know that the price of gas IS NOT what I'm basing my vote FOR Talent on. I'm basing it on McCaskill running lockstep with the morons in her party. If given the chance, since she's decided she needs to spend more time in my part of the state, I'll tell her exactly that!


17 posted on 08/26/2006 4:47:58 PM PDT by swmobuffalo (The only good terrorist is a dead terrorist.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: operation clinton cleanup
Hello,

Yes, the voters of MO did elect a dead man (he died in a plane accident too late to change the ballot). His wife ultimately served.

It was messed up, to say the least...

Glad to be here, MOgirl
18 posted on 08/26/2006 4:59:53 PM PDT by MOgirl (Democrats: The Culture of Treason (and you know what I'm talkin about!))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: arnoldc1

Yes, but people then had to live with the results and did that not change their minds? It will eventually.


19 posted on 08/26/2006 5:02:53 PM PDT by squarebarb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: FreeKeys

Three people who shouldn't be writing about the current oil markets. India's demand has declined. China not much change.

Over the last two years money-market managers, etc. have parked money in commodity futures. This is a new phenomenon, creating a price increase that may be permanent.

I read a while back about a couple of Repubs congressmen talking about raising margins on oil futures, I don't know if this will work in world exchanges. We need to cut off the source of money distorting the market.


20 posted on 08/26/2006 5:03:00 PM PDT by Shermy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-76 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson