Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Mojave
As I look forward to seeing your source for claiming the common law was "made up".

I don't need one. Anyone who has taken a first year torts class knows it was made up by juges starting in England.
374 posted on 08/26/2006 9:15:36 PM PDT by jf55510
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 371 | View Replies ]


To: jf55510
it was made up by juges starting in England.

When?

378 posted on 08/26/2006 9:22:17 PM PDT by Mojave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 374 | View Replies ]

To: jf55510

When I went to England last month on a legal junket, one Oxford professor noted that the reason English courts were allowed to create published precedents, which were then followed, and became law as it were, was that it was all in "legal French," until the late 18th century, not understood by Parliament, and by the time the action was writen in English, it was too late for Parliament to recoup its lost power, in that regard. The tradition of courts creating legal precedents, with the force of law. had become too ingrained, to reverse. Tradition, tradition! In Civil Law countries, although it is changing now in many Civil Law nations, courts are not allowed to create legal precedent with the force of law, in the sense that subsequent courts must follow such prececents, if lower courts.


379 posted on 08/26/2006 9:24:13 PM PDT by Torie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 374 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson