[ClaireSolt]

The difference is that Horowitz actually proves his case while you just dismiss it and go on a paen about PR. Read his book.

Having driven the Democratic Party to the brink of bankruptcy, Soros, [in effect, took financial control of it]. That is obviously a tin foil hat conspiracy theory

[conservatism_IS_compassion]

Horowitz actually proves his case while you just dismiss it and go on a paen about PR. Read his book.

My point is that Horowitz' case is wierd, but he does prove it.

My point is that Soros has "taken over" the Democratic Party with his money and with the PR campaign to "eliminate money from politics," but the Democratic Party was already the party of big money. The Democratic Party is the party of PR - the party of money and big journalism. And now the party of Soros. But part of the PR is maintaining that the Democratic Party is the party of the little guy.

Of "the little guy," and not of some billionaire with a foreign accent.