Skip to comments.
Getting real about the real estate bubble
cnn.com ^
| 8-25-06
| Shawn Tully
Posted on 08/25/2006 8:57:15 AM PDT by Hydroshock
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-87 next last
To: Hydroshock
Whenever someone says "this time it's different," it isn't. Period.
2
posted on
08/25/2006 8:58:51 AM PDT
by
RexBeach
To: Hydroshock
Here is the real story. A newly re assessed home valued at $687,000.00 now up for sale. Asking price $885,000.00.
3
posted on
08/25/2006 9:03:55 AM PDT
by
UB355
(Slower Traffic Keep Right)
To: Hydroshock
Homeowners just saw their wealth shrink, by a lot. Tech Bubble under Clinton: "I have $2 Million in Enron stock! Whoo-Hoo! I can retire!"
Rude awakening Type A: "My Enron stock has no value. I have to keep working."
Rude awakening Type B:"My Enron stock has no value. Good thing I diversified."
Real estate bubble under Bush: "I have a beautiful home! It's a $1 Million mansion!"
Rude awakening Type A: "I have a beautiful home! It's a $750,000 mansion!"
Bubbles hurt people who have made dumb decisions. It's the nature of economics.
4
posted on
08/25/2006 9:04:44 AM PDT
by
ClearCase_guy
( “I'm the Emperor, and I want dumplings!” (German: Ich bin der Kaiser und will Knödel.))
To: Hydroshock
"Homeowners just saw their wealth shrink, by a lot. The numbers will only get worse. It's time to examine the clichés that the "experts" - chiefly analysts and economists from realtors and mortgage associations - used to convince Americans that what they're seeing now could never happen."
_________________________
I think the one myth that never seems to get debunked is "your home is an investment". It isn't and never has been. It is a place where you want to live. The pull back in the market is not all that surprising and anybody who bought with the idea that the property would continue to climb in real terms throughout the time of ownership should not have bought. However, I don't believe there will be a collapse in values. Those that could afford what they bought will mostly stay put for a while and sell at break even or slight gains.
5
posted on
08/25/2006 9:05:23 AM PDT
by
wmfights
(Psalm : 27)
To: UB355
"Here is the real story. A newly re assessed home valued at $687,000.00 now up for sale. Asking price $885,000.00.Just curious. Since when does "asking price" constitute a REAL sale price?
6
posted on
08/25/2006 9:11:47 AM PDT
by
FixitGuy
To: wmfights
"However, I don't believe there will be a collapse in values. Those that could afford what they bought will mostly stay put for a while and sell at break even or slight gains."
Depends on where you live. I can see prices in CA dropping as every business owner leaves the state causing supply to outstrip demand. Here in Florida prices will continue to increase but at a slower rate.
To: ClearCase_guy
In your example the real estate investor fared much better. Enron investors basically lost all, but the real estate decline will reverse over time, plus the "loss" was just 25%.
8
posted on
08/25/2006 9:12:11 AM PDT
by
Disambiguator
(Don't mess with Israel.)
To: Hydroshock
I read the entire article and the explanation of the myths was pretty much on target. I predict a 12-20% delcine nationwide in the prices of a lot of homes in the overbuilt housing markets between now and 1st qtr 2008.
9
posted on
08/25/2006 9:12:47 AM PDT
by
RSmithOpt
(Liberalism: Highway to Hell)
To: Disambiguator
Any stock has the possibility of losing all of it's value. Companies go out of business. This is not news.
Homes can lose a lot of value (25% loss of value is extreme). But I don't think you can point to any house in America and say, "That has no value. You want it? Take it. It's free."
10
posted on
08/25/2006 9:14:46 AM PDT
by
ClearCase_guy
( “I'm the Emperor, and I want dumplings!” (German: Ich bin der Kaiser und will Knödel.))
To: wmfights
I agree, real estate is illiquid. Anyone owning one home/property needs that as a place to live. Most second-property owners can afford to sit back and wait for markets to improve. Those over-extended in RE are likely to have to dump property and take a loss, but transactions take a lot of time, and our population is growing fast. Very fast. At least here in Colorado where we have a massive influx of immigrants. The only thing that would make prices crash hard is if everyone tries to unload at once. I don't see it happening.
11
posted on
08/25/2006 9:15:55 AM PDT
by
mallardx
To: ClearCase_guy
Bubbles hurt people who have made dumb decisions. It's the nature of economics.It's a lot more than that. Everyone was touting the rising prices of homes as the future wealth of America - even Bush.
12
posted on
08/25/2006 9:17:50 AM PDT
by
raybbr
(You think it's bad now - wait till the anchor babies start to vote.)
To: RSmithOpt
I read the entire article and the explanation of the myths was pretty much on target. I predict a 12-20% delcine nationwide in the prices of a lot of homes in the overbuilt housing markets between now and 1st qtr 2008.
That's about inline with my expectations. It's going to be brutal in the overbuilt and oversold bubble markets(Boston, San Diego, etc).
To: ClearCase_guy
I went through this the other day with a guy, but you are 99.99% right. The only exceptions being those cases (see them a lot on HGTV) where the city cannot even get a bid to tear down a house, so they "sell" the house for $1 on the promise that the new owner will live in and rehab the house. I saw some they did in Chicago -- 5,000 SQUARE FOOT, ALL BRICK, VICTORIAN MANSIONS SELLING FOR $1. These are inner city shut downs now, where the value of the home is less than the value of the crack that could be vacuumed from between the floor boards.
14
posted on
08/25/2006 9:20:44 AM PDT
by
RayStacy
To: wmfights
I have always looked at my house as an important, valuable family asset. I have to pay to live somewhere.
15
posted on
08/25/2006 9:21:08 AM PDT
by
Hydroshock
( (Proverbs 22:7). The rich ruleth over the poor, and the borrower is servant to the lender.)
To: wmfights
However, I don't believe there will be a collapse in values. Those that could afford what they bought will mostly stay put for a while and sell at break even or slight gains. Come on, don't you realize the sky is falling?/sarcasm off
16
posted on
08/25/2006 9:23:40 AM PDT
by
wagglebee
("We are ready for the greatest achievements in the history of freedom." -- President Bush, 1/20/05)
To: Hydroshock
From the article...
In the Northeast, they dropped 2.1 percent from July of 2005, at the same time prices nationwide rose around 3 percent, meaning that houses lost over 5 percent of their value adjusted for inflation.
can somebody explain this math ? I mean, besides a Democrat explaining a program cut ...
To: wmfights
Homeowners just saw their wealth shrink, by a lot. How? They still have a house. Getting upset over paper losses is for idiots.
18
posted on
08/25/2006 9:24:17 AM PDT
by
Centurion2000
(Islam is a subsingularity memetic perversion : (http://www.orionsarm.com/topics/perversities.html))
To: Disambiguator
In your example the real estate investor fared much better. Enron investors basically lost all, but the real estate decline will reverse over time, plus the "loss" was just 25%. However, most real estate is owned with a lot of leverage. some of the more aggressive "affordability" mortgage products have 0 or even negative equity contribution from the owner. If I own something outright that goes down 25%, no biggy. If I own something with 20% down which goes down 25%, I am screwed should the bank want its money back.
19
posted on
08/25/2006 9:25:11 AM PDT
by
nj_pilot
To: Hydroshock
My own property has been holding steady for 40 years. I can't imagine there is any kind of bubble here even if people are always making offers--usually offers to steal below market.
20
posted on
08/25/2006 9:25:27 AM PDT
by
RightWhale
(Repeal the law of the excluded middle)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-87 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson