Skip to comments.
Chirac: 15,000 Peacekeepers 'Excessive'
ABC News ^
| 8-25-06
Posted on 08/25/2006 7:21:28 AM PDT by SJackson
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-32 next last
1
posted on
08/25/2006 7:21:28 AM PDT
by
SJackson
To: SJackson
2
posted on
08/25/2006 7:22:58 AM PDT
by
mewzilla
(Property must be secured or liberty cannot exist. John Adams)
To: SJackson
Chirac should note that the number of police who patrol the streets of Paris is also excessive.
3
posted on
08/25/2006 7:23:15 AM PDT
by
coconutt2000
(NO MORE PEACE FOR OIL!!! DOWN WITH TYRANTS, TERRORISTS, AND TIMIDCRATS!!!! (3-T's For World Peace))
To: SJackson
"Where are we going to find enough white fabric in time?"
-Jacques Chirac
4
posted on
08/25/2006 7:23:18 AM PDT
by
Buck W.
(If you push something hard enough, it will fall over.)
To: SJackson
Only takes one lonely foot soldier to wave a white flag.
5
posted on
08/25/2006 7:23:24 AM PDT
by
LIConFem
(Just opened a new seafood restaurant in Great Britain, called "Squid Pro Quid")
To: SJackson
Chirac is right. How would they provide cheese to 15,000 troops.
6
posted on
08/25/2006 7:23:38 AM PDT
by
RexBeach
To: SJackson
This has got to be a record even for the French. They surrendered on their OWN UN resolution even before it was put in place!
7
posted on
08/25/2006 7:24:09 AM PDT
by
MNJohnnie
( Elections are more important then the feelings of the POS Cons (Perpetually Offended Syndrome))
To: MNJohnnie
To: SJackson
Disproportionate peacekeeping response.
Sacre bleu, Chirac suggests a new Maginot line complete with surrender pillboxes and white flag turrets.
9
posted on
08/25/2006 7:27:49 AM PDT
by
A message
(We who care, Can Not Fail)
To: SJackson
Well, it does not take more than 20 or so to look the other way while muslim terrorists rearm for another go at Israel.
10
posted on
08/25/2006 7:30:25 AM PDT
by
PeteB570
(Guns, what real men want for Christmas)
To: Buck W.
To: A message
I think it is fascinating to see how many Europeans are now involved in fighting in the Middle East. Of course JK et al still say everyone hates us while they have come around to Bush's view with boots on the ground.
To: SJackson
Hard as it is to believe, he may just have a point here. The UN is supposed to be patrolling the area south of the Litani River. That's an area rougly 18 miles by 25 miles. Do they really need 15,000 troops, half of them Muslim, plus the Lebanese army to control it? One way or the other the U.S. is going to be footing a big part of the bill for this, I don't want it wasted any more than it's already going to be.
To: SJackson
Once Again...
14
posted on
08/25/2006 7:32:49 AM PDT
by
NYleatherneck
(It ain't a World War until the French surrender.)
To: ClaireSolt
15
posted on
08/25/2006 7:34:28 AM PDT
by
A message
(We who care, Can Not Fail)
To: mewzilla
Charac has got it perfectly right. If your objective is to provide a trip wire against a civilized Western nation from taking military action, a couple of thousand troops wearing blue helmets is more than enough. And that of course is Chirac's objective.
If on the other hand Charac's objective were legitimate, that is, if he wanted to prevent a terrorist guerrilla force from permeating the indigenous population, arming itself, and digging in, 15,000 troops on the ground could hardly do it.
So Israel has got itself into a hell of a position. Hizballah will be rearmed and repositioned under the protection of the UN and Israel will be constrained by the very same force. The whole raison d'être for the war has been stood on its head by Charac.
16
posted on
08/25/2006 7:35:42 AM PDT
by
nathanbedford
("I like to legislate. I feel I've done a lot of good." Sen. Robert Byrd)
To: dennisw; Cachelot; Nix 2; veronica; Catspaw; knighthawk; Alouette; Optimist; weikel; Lent; GregB; ..
If you'd like to be on this middle east/political ping list, please FR mail me.
High volume. Articles on Israel can also be found by clicking on the Topic or Keyword Israel. also
2006israelwar or WOT
..................
17
posted on
08/25/2006 7:37:43 AM PDT
by
SJackson
(The Pilgrims—Doing the jobs Native Americans wouldn't do!)
To: All
Actually, what is happening is Chirac is finally being told that Rice and Bush have outmaneuvered him. Understand that the troops are not there, from the US perspective, to do anything other than get paid and eat. You see, the logistics put into place to pay, feed, clothe and provide R&R for these troops is going to pump money into the region that is not going to go through any corrupt Lebanese gov't.
It will go to the local entrepreneurs. This means economic activity and that means employment -- the bane of all terrorist recruiters.
Bush and Rice have maneuvered to gut Hezbollah where it really hurts, in personnel expense. For Hezbollah's funding sources to keep them going now, they have to outbid employers for young men -- not just pick them up off street corners.
18
posted on
08/25/2006 7:41:46 AM PDT
by
Owen
To: SJackson
How anyone can take anything the french say or do seriously anymore is quite beyond me.
They have become an international laughing stock.
19
posted on
08/25/2006 7:46:24 AM PDT
by
reagan_fanatic
(What Darwin denied he now regrets)
To: SJackson
Chirac is right. Can you imagine the chaos if fighting breaks out and 15,000 peacekeepers become speed bumps for IDF tanks.
20
posted on
08/25/2006 7:47:23 AM PDT
by
BallyBill
(Serial Hit-N-Run poster)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-32 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson