Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Lame Plame Game Flames Out
The American Thinker ^ | August 25, 2006

Posted on 08/25/2006 4:41:30 AM PDT by Peach

The much-publicized Plame civil suit is off to a bad start. The plaintiffs moved for permission to leave their residential address off the complaint. Judge Bates of the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia gave the motion short shrift:

Plaintiffs ask that, ”[o]ut of respect for [their] privacy in light of their public visibility,”

Pls.’ Mot. at 1, they be excused from complying with rules requiring that each party to a civil action include his or her full residential address in the caption of the “first filing by or on behalf of” the party. See L. Civ. R. 5.1(e)(1), 11.1. This Court does not readily grant relief from the ordinary application of such rules, nor does the Court believe that a plaintiff’s mere invocation of Case 1:06-cv-01258-JDB Document 5 Filed 08/24/2006 Page 1 of 3 privacy interests and public prominence, without more, warrants an exception to rules that apply to all other litigants. Moreover, the implicit premise of plaintiffs’ motion—that their residential address is confidential—is questionable. In less than thirty minutes, the Court was able to ascertain plaintiffs’ residential address from multiple publicly available sources, including a database of federal government records. Indeed, an attorney who filed this motion on plaintiffs’ behalf has stated in a nationally circulated newspaper that he is plaintiffs’ next-door neighbor, and the residential address of that attorney also is readily ascertainable. Based on the current record, then, the relief plaintiffs seek is not warranted. [emphasis added]

Case 1:06-cv-01258-JDB Document 5 Filed 08/24/2006 Page 2 of 3 Clarice Feldman 8 25 06


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Extended News; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: cialeak; lameplameblamegame; lookatmelookatme; plame; plamegate
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-50 last
To: JOHN ADAMS

If you're getting too much publicity, fire your publicist.


41 posted on 08/25/2006 6:41:41 AM PDT by gridlock (The 'Pubbies will pick up at least TWO seats in the Senate and FOUR seats in the House in 2006)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Peach
Lame Plame Game Flames Out

Better headline:

Lame Plame Game Tames.

42 posted on 08/25/2006 6:42:42 AM PDT by Lazamataz (Islam is a perversion of faith, a lie against human spirit, an obscenity shouted in the face of G_d)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Peach

Actually, I think their original attorney, who is a real lawyer from a reputable law firm, DID explain the facts of life to them, including the fact that they had a lousy case. That (and perhaps their unwillingness or inability to pay him) is why they are now represented their next door neighbor.


43 posted on 08/25/2006 6:44:56 AM PDT by blau993
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Peach

I claim blame!


44 posted on 08/25/2006 7:20:27 AM PDT by dangus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dangus

the shame of it all!


45 posted on 08/25/2006 7:22:36 AM PDT by dangus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: Lazamataz

Plame blames lame tame fame game


46 posted on 08/25/2006 8:00:27 AM PDT by Phrostie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: pissant
No, a freeper would bitchslap Joe Wilson. Twice.

And one for Jenny and the wimp.

47 posted on 08/25/2006 8:18:39 AM PDT by MrEdd (More cheep than a flock of baby chickens.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: MrEdd

LOL. Yes, that too.


48 posted on 08/25/2006 8:28:12 AM PDT by pissant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]


49 posted on 08/25/2006 9:47:26 AM PDT by mvpel (Michael Pelletier)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: Lazamataz

Lame Plame-Game Aim to Claim Name to Blame for Fame


50 posted on 08/25/2006 10:20:19 AM PDT by jellybean (Proud to be an Ann-droid and a Steyn-aholic)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-50 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson