Lame Plame Game Flames Out

The American Thinker ^ | August 25, 2006

[Peach]

This judge sounds like a freeper.

[stocksthatgoup]

Since it is okay to give out Rumsfeld's summer home address, why doesnt the news media give us the wilson-plame address? The public has a right to know!

[shalom aleichem]

or he/she tapped into the fabled rapid response FR research database.

[paudio]

What are they afraid of? Publicity? Threats?

[Peach]

And not just Rumsfeld's address but the NYT helpfully pointed out where the security cameras were.

[Peach]

They eat up the publicity. Love it.

[Anti-Bubba182]

Judge gives a beatch slap! The whole purpose of the suit is to get publicity for better book sales.

[marvlus]

Let's add another word to the title.

Lame Plame Blame Game Flames Out

[kidd]

Kinda hard to state that you're a covert agent when a 30 minute search yields your home address.

[Loud Mime]

The other reason for this suit is to feed their needy liberals with more vomit of hatred and victimization.

These people remind me of my exwife.....always playing the victim no matter how much they have to lie.

[jennyjenny]

In less than thirty minutes, the Court was able to ascertain plaintiffs’ residential address from multiple publicly available sources, including a database of federal government records. Indeed, an attorney who filed this motion on plaintiffs’ behalf has stated in a nationally circulated newspaper that he is plaintiffs’ next-door neighbor, and the residential address of that attorney also is readily ascertainable. Based on the current record, then, the relief plaintiffs seek is not warranted.

Heh.

So these people outed their own address and now want it a secret again? Sounds like there is a pattern of behavior here.

[GreenAccord]

You have to love the irony that these 'outed' covert agents expect the courts to hide a facet of their identity and they get a 'no special treatment' reply.

[JOHN ADAMS]

[o]ut of respect for [their] privacy in light of their public visibility

Am I the only one to whom it appears as if the loss (disappearance) of their privacy is caused by their "public visibility" which they themselves created?

[DainBramage]

"whereas said plaintiff also has stated she boinked her husband on the second date and

told him she was a secret agent this court has reason to laugh to the point of tears..yada yada'

[Peach]

Heh.

[Peach]

Wasn't that a riot to read last year? I guess covert doesn't have the meaning it once had.

[Obadiah]

Live by the sword...

[Peach]

Oh, you're not the only one.

[Peach]

These people clearly don't mind looking foolish.