Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Wolfstar
She just takes the baby to the nearest hospital, drops it off saying it's not wanted, and leaves. End of saga.

Presumably she values her marriage, despite her rejection of her child. Going behind her husband's back, even if it's legal (and I'm not sure it is), could cause her a new world of hurt she doesn't want.
172 posted on 08/25/2006 10:49:21 AM PDT by HostileTerritory
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]


To: HostileTerritory
Presumably she values her marriage, despite her rejection of her child. Going behind her husband's back, even if it's legal (and I'm not sure it is), could cause her a new world of hurt she doesn't want.

You see, that's the problem I have with many of the posts on this thread. It's all about the woman, and her marriage, and problems that might ensue if she goes behind her husband's back.

What about the child? If that letter is to be believed, that baby is genuinely in danger. As someone else posted earlier, get the baby into a safe environment, then sort the rest of the stuff out afterwards.

Taking the baby to a hospital and dropping her off would be a whole heck of a lot more constructive than sending some stupid anonymous letter to Dear Abby and getting Abby's pablum back in return.

195 posted on 08/25/2006 12:37:40 PM PDT by Wolfstar (Suffer the little children to come unto Me...for of such is the kingdom of God. [Mark 10:13-14])
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 172 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson