Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: glorgau
Am I wrong, or would a criminal only have to pick up his casings to foil this new law?
33 posted on 08/24/2006 9:15:07 PM PDT by singfreedom ("Victory at all costs,.......for without victory there is no survival."--Churchill--that's "Winston")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]


To: singfreedom

That's all they need to do. Laws are not about results. They are about convincing voters that they are doing something to make them safer. Besides, if this makes the cost of a gun fractionally higher, a few people here and there will be stripped of the ability to afford a gun, and that's a good thing (as far as they are concerned).


37 posted on 08/24/2006 9:43:14 PM PDT by kylaka
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies ]

To: singfreedom

"Am I wrong, or would a criminal only have to pick up his casings to foil this new law?"

You're right, but I don't see a lot of drive-bys coming back to police up their brass.


42 posted on 08/24/2006 11:22:12 PM PDT by PLMerite ("Unarmed, one can only flee from Evil. But Evil isn't overcome by fleeing from it." Jeff Cooper)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies ]

To: singfreedom
Am I wrong, or would a criminal only have to pick up his casings to foil this new law?

Most shootings don't happen in the privacy of a home. They happen on the street and people run away. They don't have time to grab the casings. But this is moot because all the guns on the street used in crimes are illegal. OK, 99.9% of them.

43 posted on 08/24/2006 11:23:35 PM PDT by rudabaga
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson