Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Jorge
If you are speaking of my post to freedumb2003, then I am afraid that you are projecting both meaning and words that were never intended.

So let me set the record straight from my perspective, just in ccase.

The sanctity of life is paramount in our society, and should be. It is a fundamental pillar upon which our liberty and morality is based.

When there is any doubt, I bel;ieve that we simply must ere on the side of life and ensure that that sanctity is upheld.

I personally believe there was significant doubt regarding all of the issues you raised...suffering, extent of recoverability, and whether and what she had conveyed to others. In the absence of a clear directive, legally or otherwise, and when there is such a blatant conflict of interest...it is clear, at least to me, that extreme caution is callled for.

But that is my opinion, you are free to believe as you wish and I wouldn't think of interjectiong my own beliefs or feelings on your clearly, unambigous, stated wishes when such doubt and conflict do not exist.

31 posted on 08/24/2006 7:32:29 PM PDT by Jeff Head (www.dragonsfuryseries.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies ]


To: Jeff Head
If you are speaking of my post to freedumb2003, then I am afraid that you are projecting both meaning and words that were never intended.

I never even READ your post much less responded or "projected" ANYTHING regarding your intentions.

34 posted on 08/24/2006 7:45:17 PM PDT by Jorge
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson