Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Richard Axtell

The last sentence is what everyone seems to care about. This study seems to say that implantation of a fertilized egg is not pervented.


9 posted on 08/24/2006 7:02:48 PM PDT by From many - one.
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]


To: From many - one.

not pre-vented either.


10 posted on 08/24/2006 7:04:27 PM PDT by From many - one.
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

To: From many - one.; Richard Axtell; hocndoc
In addition, this study does not support an anti-implantation contraceptive effect of LNG in EC; however, additional targets, besides those described herein, should also be considered and further investigated for the contraceptive effects of LNG.

That's kind of like saying that running an OBDII test on my Chevrolet Tahoe did not support a non-stopping effect of new brakes...

The test had no way of testing actual implantation. IN fact - when reading the entire test, we find that the test only really addressed chemical and hormonal effects, as well as limited testing of any changes (or lack thereof) to some tissues.

Nothing in the test was designed to disclude the possibility that this drug (basically a super dose of birth control pills) prevents implantation. It is all conjecture.

Just check the literature with Plan B - it specifies that it "may prevent the implantation of fertilized ovum".

So the study doesn's support nor dis-prove that method.

14 posted on 08/25/2006 5:18:28 AM PDT by TheBattman (Islam (and liberalism)- the cult of a Cancer on Society)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson