Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Richard Axtell; hocndoc
The operant goal of this study was to arrive at the following conclusion (at the end of the article) because the reason for this study was to search how the medication achieves contraception and to eliminate implantation prevention as a mechanism for this product: "In addition, this study does not support an anti-implantation contraceptive effect of LNG in EC; however, additional targets, besides those described herein, should also be considered and further investigated for the contraceptive effects of LNG." As stated, the study does not address other possible means by which this hormonal bolus prevents a pregnancy being achieved.
7 posted on 08/24/2006 6:57:58 PM PDT by MHGinTN (If you can read this, you've had life support from someone. Promote life support for others.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]


To: MHGinTN

It's those other proofs I'm waiting on. But, the evidence is pretty good, all those blood levels, the ultrasound studies, the seemingly normal function of the uterine wall.


11 posted on 08/24/2006 8:12:52 PM PDT by hocndoc (http://www.lifeethics.org/www.lifeethics.org/index.html)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson