"Yes, the "he" refers to Dobson, but the author didn't quote Dobson.
"
I don't care whether he quoted Dobson or not. The writer attributed that nonsense directly to Dobson. It sounds just like Dobson.
You can put lipstick on this porker, but it's still a porker.
Dobson's not trustworthy. He says things that are not true, yet people just keep sending him money. Maybe that's why he does it?
I take it you couldn't find what you were looking for. I looked on some websites myself and couldnt find anything attributing the text in question directly to Dobson. It could be your bias against Dobson is affecting your judgment here.