To: Stone Mountain
I don't have Ann's book at the office with me, so you will have to settle for my own argument in post #33. As to your snarky comment... I don't care to have an argument with a disagreeable ass. I'll stick to those who can communicate beyond grade school taunting.
45 posted on
08/24/2006 12:45:47 PM PDT by
pgyanke
(Christ embraces sinners; liberals embrace the sin.)
To: pgyanke
MY snarky comment? LOL. But here's the part you referenced.
However, to my knowledge no one has yet found proof of a change to different species. We have found adaptation and mutation but I know of no species that has been proven to have "fathered" a new and separate species--genetically different. If I'm wrong, I would appreciate correction.
Do you believe that dogs are descendants of wolves? Do you belive that housecats are descendants of the big cats - tigers, etc? Surely you aren't talking about a 1-generation change in species, right? If this isn't a sufficient argument for you, I would have to ask you what you specifically referred to when you say "genetically different."
To: pgyanke
Sorry - last part got cut off...
I would have to ask you what you specifically referred to when you say "genetically different." After all, we are genetically similar to chimpanzees in 97% of our DNA..
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson