Did you have a specific comment regarding the content of the article, or did you just show up because you're pissed off and wanted to throw a bomb?
I plead guilty to the charge of not responding to the posted article. I considered the actual transcript to be both unremarkable and non sequitur. My response was directed at the pretentious, arrogant, condescension, feigned omniscience, obnoxious persona and faux sincerity of herr Limbaugh. To him truth is a fungible concept to be molded and selectively asserted to suit his purpose dejour, the context and underlying purpose of his selected anecdotal examples being unimportant to his wished for conclusions. I trust in the axiom that when all evil is argued to exist in one place and all beneficence in his favorite political place, there probably really nothing to his arguemnts other than storm and fury.