To: crz
My point is: there is no reason to kill the baby first...yes the baby may die b/c of being removed if it is not yet viable (as in the case of tubal pregnancies/tubal removal) but sucking out the baby's brains prior to removing it does nothing to save/help the mother. Ever.
If a baby has to be removed b/c of maternal medical reasons then do it but there is no purpose, other than wanting a dead baby, to killing it first.
44 posted on
08/23/2006 5:55:07 PM PDT by
socialismisinsidious
( The socialist income tax system turns US citizens into beggars or quitters!)
To: socialismisinsidious
If a baby has to be removed b/c of maternal medical reasons then do itIf your wife were bleeding to death, and the very small baby had to be removed, would you not want an obstetrical surgeon who had been taught to do the procedure?
48 posted on
08/23/2006 5:59:00 PM PDT by
Jim Noble
(I say we take off and nuke the site from orbit - it's the only way to be sure.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson