Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: RaceBannon
Some pregnancies bring great threat to the mother's life when things go wrong.

I believe labor can be and is induced in a lot of those cases. If the baby is viable, they can try to save it. Ripping limbs off and smashing brains in is not necessary.

32 posted on 08/23/2006 5:09:03 PM PDT by conservative cat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies ]


To: conservative cat

depends on the case itself, not all babies can be saved, and also, the life of the mother is more important. She already has family, already is functional.

Years ago, some hospitals sacrificed the mother to save the Baby! That is absurd.

Plus, we arent talking baout women choosing to end the baby's life, we are talking baout saving the mother's life.

two different cases.

My sister had to abort her child about 24 years ago or so, she was about 3.5 months along, maybe 4. She had a toxemia, gained over 50 pounds by that time, her heart rate was skyrocketing, other health issues, the choice was die or abort.

Her next pregnancy resulted in a 5 week preemie...who is now 20 and a stone cold fox President's List College student basketball star in Mass!...and if I catch you looking, Uncle Jim will beat you like a red-headed step child!


34 posted on 08/23/2006 5:16:24 PM PDT by RaceBannon (Innocent until proven guilty: The Pendleton 8)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies ]

To: conservative cat; wagglebee

The soft-on-abortion conservatives are out in force. No amount of spin can disguise the fact that the vast majority of abortions are ones of convenience and are morally abominable. Nevertheless any excuse will be used to push the agenda.


35 posted on 08/23/2006 5:34:48 PM PDT by Norman Bates
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson