To: MHGinTN
Sure. 'Pro Life' is one thing, but treating every single cell that could possibly become a human being is so ridiculous that Pythonesque mockery is the only appropriate response (I am referring to the song out of 'Meaning of life'). I don't support cutting up third trimester babies but when someone is saying that even taking one cell out of an embryo is tantamount to abortion then that is so silly that I just shake my head. Some positions are worth reasoning with, some are only suitable to be mocked.
39 posted on
08/24/2006 11:16:55 AM PDT by
RedStateRocker
(Nuke Mecca, Deport all illegals, abolish the IRS, ATF and DEA)
To: RedStateRocker
The musing of certain self-appointed experts on this thread not withstanding, here's the reality of this procedure.
When an identical twin emerges from the initial zygote of conception, Science is not able to identify which of the first four to six to eight cells of the developing embryo is the actual one that is the zygote age of the twin. Does that help to see why this could actually be killing the twin in some instances? Or do you not consider the zygote age of the human lifetime to be worthy of protection as a human being in fact?
40 posted on
08/24/2006 2:50:22 PM PDT by
MHGinTN
(If you can read this, you've had life support from someone. Promote life support for others.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson