[Dan(9698)]

Taking something 'for granted', and 'assuming' something to be so, isn't 'ruling specifically' by a long shot, now, is it?

They reversed the FISA Judge, and admonished him in the "dicta".

The ACLU asked the Supreme Court to review. They declined.

There is no court ruling other than the dingbat in Detroit, that disagrees with the "dicta".

Your rant still sounds like the DNC talking points.

[RustMartialis]

Again, I point out the decision simply does not address the issue you claim it does. I've explained it more than once, but you still don't get it. So I give up.

--R.