Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Enterprise

Evidently you don't understand the meaning of Fraud. It's not fraud if a court rules it such. If a court rules it a fact, then it's a fact. That doesn't mean it has to be true.

The court cannot be held responsible. You are obligated to know that you have been served at a fictious address, not the court.


13 posted on 08/22/2006 5:14:56 PM PDT by Diplomat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]


To: Diplomat
You are obligated to know that you have been served at a fictious address

And how is that possible?

18 posted on 08/22/2006 5:42:29 PM PDT by A. Pole (GBW: "We're going to help build a virtual border, this border is changing and it needs to change")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]

To: Diplomat

I am not suggesting that a court be held responsible. I am suggesting that the person who made the false claim, and who has received the aid falsely, and continues to receive the aid falsely be held criminally responsible. And agencies which can be shown to have cooperated in the false and reckless disbursement of aid should be held civilly liable.


19 posted on 08/22/2006 5:57:53 PM PDT by Enterprise (Let's not enforce laws that are already on the books, let's just write new laws we won't enforce.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson