[razzle]

"Oh, come on, quit embarrassing yourself!"

Now your getting angry, come on let it out, I just dissed your religion that you are force feeding my kids with your phony drawings of embryos, and apes, and fake skulls. Don't you guys get tired of being fools.

Check out the Bet Stein reference, and while you are at it, check out the fossile record for darwinism - oops no evidence, and the fake embryo drawings, or the lack of RNA evidence, or the Cambrian explosion - oops another dead end for darwin and his disciples. Soon your religion will end up like Marx's and Freud's.

[balrog666]

Keep on aligning yourself with Paris Hilton and Rosie O'Donut - surely it will pay off for you someday.

[js1138]

Check out the Bet Stein reference, and while you are at it,

There is no Bet Stein reference, not any Ben Stien reference nor any Ben Stein reference.

[Coyoteman]

...and fake skulls

I challenged you back on #591 to document the fakes you are so fond of claiming, and haven't heard back from you yet. Now here you are, hours later, making about the same silly and oft-discredited claim.

You keep claiming all the evidence is faked; shouldn't you start backing up your claims with some evidence of some kind?

We're waiting...

[balrog666]

Learned to spell yet?

[Coyoteman]

...and fake skulls.

Are you hiding? I have challenged you now twice on this thread to support your comments that all the evidence for evolution is fake (posts #591 and 671).

How about it? Is this skull faked? If so, please detail some evidence for your belief.

(Your credibility is sinking fast.)

---

Herto skulls (Homo sapiens idaltu)

Some new fossils from Herto in Ethiopia, are the oldest known modern human fossils, at 160,000 yrs. The discoverers have assigned them to a new subspecies, Homo sapiens idaltu, and say that they are anatomically and chronologically intermediate between older archaic humans and more recent fully modern humans. Their age and anatomy is cited as strong evidence for the emergence of modern humans from Africa, and against the multiregional theory which argues that modern humans evolved in many places around the world.

http://www.talkorigins.org/faqs/homs/herto.html

[b_sharp]

"Check out the Bet Stein reference, and while you are at it, check out the fossile record for darwinism - oops no evidence, and the fake embryo drawings, or the lack of RNA evidence, or the Cambrian explosion - oops another dead end for darwin and his disciples. Soon your religion will end up like Marx's and Freud's."

That you are repeating claims made by people *not* in the know really emphasizes your ignorance of the subject.

If you were to examine the primary literature, or at least the popular publications that explain the primary literature, you would at least understand what you are regurgiposting.

If you want to refute what I just posted may I suggest you explain, in your own words, what the Cambrian explosion was and how and why it supports creationism more than the SToE. Please be as specific as possible.

If you fail to refute my comments, I can only believe you know less than you pretend to.