It's amazing that you would have to point out to nominally educated people the following two facts:
(1) The Torah is a Jewish document, written in Hebrew, that predated the birth of Jesus of Nazareth.
(2) There is no agreed-upon secular standard of morality. It is all completely random opinionating.
To which I will append some other observations:
(1) The morality of Darwinism is simple: there is no morality - the fundamental reality of life is that the fittest survive. Therefore, human beings must maximize their fitness in order to survive and any behavior which maximizes this fitness is imperative. There is no right or wrong - there is survival and there is extinction.
(2) Hitler was not a Christian of any description nor a believer in the Bible. You made reference to Alfred Rosenberg, the individual whom Hitler entrusted with the task of authoring the official, state-sanctioned statement of Nazi ideology, entitled The Myth Of The Twentieth Century.
Rosenberg's work is explicitly anti-Christian and explicitly promotes an "enlightened" philosophical form of paganism.
Would a Christian make the possession of a specifically anti-Christian book a necessity for members of his political party? Would a Christian make the performance of specific pagan rites based on such a book mandatory for members of his personal bodyguard and the state's special forces?
The answer to both questions is obviously no.
(3) There is a clear link between Darwin and Hitler. One of Hitler's favorite books was The Foundations Of The Nineteenth Century by Houston Stewart Chamberlain.
Hitler eulogized this man in an official party address as "The Prophet Of The Third Reich" and suggested that reading his book was an essential part of any Nazi's philosophical education.
Chamberlain was an Englishman who was such a Germanophile that he became a German citizen, married Richard Wagner's daughter and wrote all his works in German - including anti-English propaganda during WWI.
Chamberlain was a "scientific" racist who drew upon Gobineau, Darwin, Galton in support of his theories.
It's obvious that the title of Roseberg's official Nazi monograph is a play on the title of Chamberlain's book.
Hitler championed the work of Roseberg and Chamberlain, Roseberg drew on Chamberlain's theories for his work and Chamberlain drew on Darwin and others for his work.
Thanks, wideawake. I'm glad my work is appreciated by someone. BTW, if these atheists succeed in getting me banned, please continue to fight the good fight.
Isn't it interesting that while Abe Foxman (professional anti-Semitic stereotype) blasts the idea that Darwin inevitably leads to Nazism, that he apparently has nothing to say when atheists insist that belief in HaShem or in Berei'shit Bara' does? And isn't it interesting that Foxman supports "gay marriage" because "Jewish tradition insists we are all created in the image of G-d?" How can he say such a thing if belief in creation by G-d inevitably leads to Nazism?
Do you think the "educated" proponents of meaninglessness on FR have the brain cells to learn Biblical Hebrew? It would be interesting if they did and discovered the origin of all the "chr*stian" stuff they hate so much. And, no offense intended to you, but I notice that a great many "philo-Semitic" anti-chr*stian atheists condemn the "old testament" and then endorse the Sermon on the Mount. How "educated" can such people be?