[PhilipFreneau]

>>>An attack on a documentary is not an attack on Christians.<<<

But an attack on an attacker who attacks a Christian is perfectly legitimate. If you bothered to read Foxman's hateful diatribe, you would have found this: "It must be remembered that D. James Kennedy is a leader among the distinct group of 'Christian Supremacists' who seek to "reclaim America for Christ" and turn the U.S. into a Christian nation guided by their strange notions of biblical law."

Foxman is a devout Christian hater. Foxman and the late Hitler have much in common.

>>>You are looking for persecution where it doesn't exist.<<<

No, the truth is you are looking for an argument with any available Christian.

[stands2reason]

You attack Foxman. According to your logic, you are anti-semitic. Do you see what I mean now?

And, no, I am not "looking for an argument with any available Christian." The only people I love in this world are Christians.

Again you see persecution all around you.

I argue against bad logic, and admonish against personal attacks.

[DanDenDar]

If you bothered to read Foxman's hateful diatribe, you would have found this: "It must be remembered that D. James Kennedy is a leader among the distinct group of 'Christian Supremacists' who seek to "reclaim America for Christ" and turn the U.S. into a Christian nation guided by their strange notions of biblical law."

D. James Kennedy is a Dominionist. What is hateful about saying so?