If you want to use the guns of the Federal Govt. to restrict actions (given those actions are not violently or coercively depriving others of life, liberty or property) then you are a nannystater and possess a perspective that is hostile to the constitution. I don't think this describes you though, right?
Asking the government to enforce existing laws justifies scorn? I disagree. I think those who think the laws are wrong should work to repeal those laws.
I'm not sure what laws they are talking about. If the hotels are not being sufficiently careful to ensure that minors can not get access to pornography without their parents' consent (and I know this happens) then I agree with the groups. If the laws say that people can't watch what they want to in a hotel room once rented, then I would disagree with those laws.
Was the original article specific?
Shalom.