Paul Johnson is anything but a liberal academic.
His problem here is that he is not particularly an economic historian.
And he is very dependent on his researchers.
But he is the best overall, except for LS--whose textbook my department would NEVER buy.
McVey
Whoops!! I know that, but I didn't realize LS was referring to Paul Johnson with that comment. Slap me on the head and remind me not to rush through the thread so fast.....