(total loser opponent) Tasini Says Hillary's "Above the Law" Character is NOT an Issue!

peterfpaul.com ^ | 7-21-06 | peter paul

[doug from upland]

Tasini Says Hillary's "Above the Law" Character is NOT an Issue!

RE: [Contact Jonathan] Hillary Clinton's Campaign Finance Frauds and Obstruction of Justice
Re: Hillary Clinton's Campaign Finance Frauds and Obstruction of Justice

Hi Peter,

If you'd like to discuss give me a call here at the office. We are an issues-based campaign so we're not really addressing these sorts of questions, but I'd be happy to speak with you if you like.

best,

Stef

(Stephanie Cannon, Tasini Campaign Official)

Amazingly enough, the articulate adversary of Hillary Clinton's lock on the Democratic nomination for reelection to the Senate, doesnt believe that Hillary's character and conduct in winning her first election, then lying to keep her office, is an "issue". According to the campaign official detailed by Tasini to respond to my offer to explain the evidence of Hillary's election fraud and obstruction of justice, Tasini is running an "issues-based campaign" and Hillary's felonious misconduct, in plain view and with impunity from any accountability to every branch of the government is just not an "issue". Clearly, according to the only Democrat to challenge her reelection, Hillary's stand on health care and the war in Iraq trumps her cynical disregard for her oath of office and her obligation to protect and preserve the Constitution and the laws of the United States.

[doug from upland]

I spoke with the campaign a few months ago. This morning, I spoke with Stephanie Cannon. They will be lucky to get 10 votes. They don't have time and don't have the resources to research this issue. Duh, Stef, it has all been done for you. Get me a ticket and I'm in New York tomorrow. Tasini thinks he's going to capitalize on an anti-war message. Perhaps he thinks he is NY's Ned Lamont.

[My2Cents]

Truth be told, a Democrat talking about character would be a total contradiction.

[Happy Valley Dude]

Perhaps he thinks he is NY's Ned Lamont.

Ned Lamont was able to put $2.5 million into his campaign.

[sono]

Bloomberg's 2 Billion wouldn't derail Madame DeFarge at this point.

[Lonesome in Massachussets]

Madame DeFarge

Isn't that a little unfair? After all, Madame Defarge’s hatefulness does not reflect any inherent flaw, but rather results from the oppression and personal tragedy that she has suffered at the hands of the aristocracy. What's Hillary's excuse?

[Happy Valley Dude]

Bloomberg's 2 Billion wouldn't derail Madame DeFarge at this point.

But he could probably give her a competative race.

[dinasour]

Truth be told, a Democrat talking about character would be a total contradiction.

Or as I like to say, it's like getting advise on dating etiquette from Ted Bundy.

[DBrow]

Right now, the supposed crimes of Hillary are accusations that have not been proved.

Basing a campaign on unproven allegations may work sometimes, but in this case the MSM is behind Hillary and would make quick work of "baseless charges from a desperate opponent".

You are going to have to get real proof, litigated and under-oath testimony.

[doug from upland]

Somebody hasn't been paying attention. If you have been too lazy to read and follow the story, wait for the movie.

[hosepipe]

Evil is as evil does- Forest Gump..

[DBrow]

I've been following the story, DfU. If it's all wrapped up I guess I missed the indictment news, sorry. I'll try harder.

[My2Cents]

LOL. Good one.

[My2Cents]

What's Hillary's excuse?

She was forced to live in the shadow of her lumpy husband, in the backwater of Arkansas.

[no dems]

Have you shared this with the John Spencer campaign; her GOP opponent? He's really working at defeating her. From what I've seen of and heard from him, he's a stand-up guy.

[doug from upland]

Spencer has had it for some time but not used it. It seems to me that Bill's trial in March, her being forced to testify, and her filing of a fourth fraudulent FEC report would be of interest.

[chimera]

That would require a prosecutor with the guts to go up against the Clintons. Given the way they gamed the system on the impeachment deal and how the 'Rats and the media destroyed Starr and anyone else who got in the way of the Clintons, I wouldn't want to bet the mortgage on finding one. It's a no-win proposition for any prosecutor to take them on. And there isn't a court or a jury in the country who will find against the Clintons in any criminal matter. They wriggle out of any tight spot and simply move up to the next higher office.

[doug from upland]

She will never be prosecuted. We want to damage her with the truth.

[isom35]

if only we could get Vince Foster to testify...

[doug from upland]

Sorry to jump on you. As Dave Schippers says on camera, she will never be indicted. I know that will never happen. But it baffles me that no opponent will even ask her a question about this.

We have testimony from Stan Lee that he never gave her any money. Hillary and her treasurer know that. Nevertheless, even after the FEC fined the campaign 35K for failing to declare 721K, and even after they were required to file an accurate ammended report, they filed their 4th fraudulent report and declared that Lee gave 225K. They did that in broad daylight for everyone to see. It would seem that an opponent would at least ask about a public document that contradicts evidence in a criminal trial and the testimony Lee gave to the FEC, Justice Department, and FBI.

[DBrow]

I don't get it either, why is everyone protecting her?

This has been going on at least since Saul Alinsky got her on The Johnny Carson Show in, what, '64?

Despite blatant lies and smarmy denials ("I don't believe you will find a shred of evidence...").