To: Huntress
Since the release of this film is set to coincide with the runup to the 08 presidential election and will undoubtedly mirror one of the political parties planks, the total cost of the film should be considered an in kind contribution to that party and be subject to campaign finance laws.
8 posted on
08/22/2006 7:44:44 AM PDT by
gov_bean_ counter
( Helen Thomas on anticipating and handling a crisis: "I'll live under that bridge when I get to it.")
To: gov_bean_ counter
I hope he has one of those upcoming candidates in his film.
It will have to be pulled 60 days before the primary according to McCain/Feingold.
Wouldn't that just tick him off!
Probably eat himself into a coma!
LOL!
14 posted on
08/22/2006 7:47:47 AM PDT by
Bigh4u2
(Denial is the first requirement to be a liberal)
To: gov_bean_ counter
Since Michael Moore is so concerned about our evil "profit-based system" I'm sure that he's going to donate all profits from this movie in an effort to help correct the problem. </sarcasm
17 posted on
08/22/2006 7:48:36 AM PDT by
VA_Gentleman
(The Pixies wish they were Dinosaur Jr.)
To: gov_bean_ counter
Re:
the film should be considered an in kind contribution to that party I agree.
I'm sick of limo-libs spending other peoples millions and calling it a 'grass roots'.
Why pay for campaign commercials when you can string all the sound bites of the whole campaign into a 2 hour diatribe the voter pays for out of their own pocket?
What's the cost of Avid time these days? Pennies.
It bolsters the point that all art is propaganda.
81 posted on
08/22/2006 8:30:48 AM PDT by
ChadGore
(VISUALIZE 62,041,268 Bush fans. We Vote.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson