Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: AntiGuv

"Are you actually suggesting that the entire election nationwide should be re-envisioned based on a single poll?"



No, I'm saying that it is incorrect to claim that a Democrat tsunami is in the works based on summer polls of national adults. The recent generic congressional ballot is no more trustworthy than those from earlier in the summer, but it is no less trustworthy either. I think the correct baseline when measuring states and districts is electoral performance in the 2000, 2002 and 2004 elections, maybe with a slight tinge away from the GOP based on the national mood, but nothing that would indicate that Democrats will suddenly becomedominant in districts that voted for Bush and the GOP House candidate in 2000, 2002 and 2004.


153 posted on 08/23/2006 8:35:11 AM PDT by AuH2ORepublican (http://auh2orepublican.blogspot.com/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 150 | View Replies ]


To: AuH2ORepublican
No, I'm saying that it is incorrect to claim that a Democrat tsunami is in the works based on summer polls of national adults. The recent generic congressional ballot is no more trustworthy than those from earlier in the summer, but it is no less trustworthy either.

Sure, I have no dispute with that, other than to note that the claims are based on many months worth of both generic and specific polls.

I think the correct baseline when measuring states and districts is electoral performance in the 2000, 2002 and 2004 elections, maybe with a slight tinge away from the GOP based on the national mood, but nothing that would indicate that Democrats will suddenly becomedominant in districts that voted for Bush and the GOP House candidate in 2000, 2002 and 2004.

The Democrats have about twice as much money (proportionally) as they did in those other elections, so that alone is more than a "slight tinge" away from the GOP. In fact, by every factor up and down the line, including the aggregate polls, the Dems are in far better shape than they were in 2000, 2002, and 2004.

But, OK, let's say for the sake of argument that we did re-evaluate the entire nationwide portrait based on one poll. Which poll should we choose? Should we choose the 2% Dem margin (Gallup), the 9% Dem margin (CNN), or the 15% Dem margin (NYT) polled simultaneously? Oh wait, I almost forgot: The credibility of a poll is directly proportional to the desirability of the results.

154 posted on 08/23/2006 10:01:34 AM PDT by AntiGuv ("..I do things for political expediency.." - Sen. John McCain on FOX News)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 153 | View Replies ]

To: AuH2ORepublican
And, for the record, it's these polls and these polls which are most influential in my evaluation of the midterm cycle. Those are the polls, including these, these, these, and these, that have determined my view of where the election stands.
155 posted on 08/23/2006 10:19:06 AM PDT by AntiGuv ("..I do things for political expediency.." - Sen. John McCain on FOX News)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 153 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson