Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: TheDon

Or decrease it, depending on how you look at it.


42 posted on 08/21/2006 11:04:49 AM PDT by ark_girl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]


To: ark_girl
Only if you think the US would preemptively nuke Iran, or even attack Iran conventionally after they have acquired a nuke. The general idea, as with North Korea, is that possession of a nuke makes a conventional attack impossible.

Israel could make a better case for such an act under those circumstances, but they would be seen as war criminals by the world. I know, I know, most people already see them that way.

Iran would gain immense prestige in the Muslim world, especially among the jihadis, with possession of an Islamic nuke. The West's options in dealing with Iran would be narrowed considerably with the knowledge that Iran could lob a nuke at Israel, Europe, or wherever it wanted.

67 posted on 08/21/2006 2:18:33 PM PDT by TheDon (The Democratic Party is the party of TREASON!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson