Posted on 08/21/2006 6:16:02 AM PDT by areafiftyone
I would never vote for Rudy in a primary.
The Rudyphile think if they keep repeating something over and over, it becomes truth. Maybe they'll set it to music----put Rudy's Top Ten on the charts.
"There is no involvement by Guiliani in peace activist groups since his Mayorality."
"All of Rudy's pro abort, pro-gay support was back when he was Mayor."
"There is no involvement by Guiliani in liberal activities since he was Mayor."
"He only cheated on his wife when he was Mayor."
"He only put gays and liberals in his administration when he was Mayor."
"He only took campaign donations from criminals when he was Mayor."
"He only cross-dressed when he was Mayor."
"He only lived with two gay men when he was Mayor."
No it in no way shows you were or are right.
There was NO candidate more conservative than Bush with a prayer of getting the nomination.
And the two issues you mention are not significant enough to turn on the GOP or the President.
Dear Liz,
"...when he was Mayor."
In that the only elective office he has ever held was WHEN HE WAS MAYOR, what is the point of this trope, put forth by his supporters?
sitetest
You are dreaming and exaggerating the numbers by a factor of almost ten.
If Guliani is the Republican nominee, it will be because the majority of Republican primary voters want him to be.
You'd better get busy raising somebody else's profile. Guliani and McCain are way ahead of everybody else: Newt, Frist, Allen.
Who is attempting to "foist" Rudy on you? You will have your chance to vote against him in a primary. If he's the nominee, you can vote for the Constitution Party candidate.
The last one, Michael Peroutka, put his own son in foster care at the age of two. Real family guy there!
I'm pasting from the horse's mouth.
So stop being a horse's ass and accusing me of making it up. Check the site. The links are from it.
The core of those opposed vehemently to Guiliani are those who have never supported Bush or the GOP. They love the fringe candidates without a chance of winning anything. You know the names.
You are posting old news and distorting the meaning of that news.
No one who is an "officer" in an organization writes it letters. Why bother with that?
You are silly and getting sillier. Your desperation is showing.
Exactly. But that's okay because its not working on anyone. Most of the U.S. knows about Rudy. He was the most famous mayors of this country. Everything about Rudy has been in the papers years ago. Nothing new here. Whatever Rudy does or did do has been scrutinized by the media and Newspapers for years and still is. Nothing these Giuliani haters say is new. It's all old rehashed crap.
Can you copy and past where I've said he was an officer?
Go RUDY GO!!!
Yep
Wooo hooo! :-)
That claim was from one of your fellow Rudy-haters. But since you think alike I assumed you had the same idea.
I was, too, and I was right.
Abortion is not even close to the importance of protecting the nation from the Islamofascists. Islamaniacs are anti-abortion too. They will happily solve the problem for you.
Dead women get no abortions.
Just a reminder: Free Republic is a conservative site
Posted on 04/11/2006 by Jim Robinson
We fight for conservative principles, values and causes. We defend the Constitution. We defend our borders. We defend our God-given rights. We are opposed to the liberal/socialist/Marxist agenda for America. We do not willingly give up ground to the Marxists.
We fight on. We hold the majority. We continue working as hard as we possibly can to elect as many conservatives as we possibly can. We build a conservative majority that can overcome the Democrats and the RINOs.
We do not willingly give up any seats to Democrats. We add seats. Preferably, conservative seats. I would also like to remind everyone, that Free Republic does not condone racism and does not advocate violence. We exercise our first amendment rights to free speech and peaceable assembly.
We do not condemn people because of their race, religion, ethnicity, skin color, etc. We do not advocate civil war, anarchy, or an overthrow of the government.
And, yes, we are at war. And we do support our troops and their mission. We also respect our commander-in-chief and are mindful that when people disrespect him, it hurts troop morale.
We do not appreciate the mainstream media's attempts to destroy America's will to fight and we do not do anything to assist the Democrats and their accomplices in the media in their treasonous mission of undermining the war effort by providing aid and comfort to the enemy.
I'll list a few issues (by no means and exhaustive list) that will be adversely affected by Marxist/Democrats in power:
The Supreme Court
The federal judiciary
The legislative agenda
The right to life Marriage between one man, one woman
The family
Education
Health care
Private property
Taxation Oil/energy The right to keep and bear arms
The right to freedom of religion
The right to self-governance
All of our God-given rights
The Constitution
The Republic
Liberty itself
Do not get so discouraged that we give it all up. It could take generations to get it back. If ever.
"Securing the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity" is our duty.
You appear to be cornfused. It was better Dead than Red.
I like him too. He'd get my vote.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.