Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: TWfromTEXAS
There was NO difference in the way South Africa was run and any other sub-Sahara African country except that the dominate tribe was white. we ONLY opposed it BECAUSE it was white not the way it acted or we would have to oppose all the others.

There is a big difference. Other sub-Sarahan countries at least paid lip service to the idea of equality under the law. South Africa did not.

50 posted on 08/22/2006 7:09:40 PM PDT by zimdog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]


To: zimdog
There is a big difference. Other sub-Sarahan countries at least paid lip service to the idea of equality under the law.

Oh RIGHT. Far better to live in a country where you can't vote and ten's of thousands are killed because they are from the wrong tribe, then to live where you can't vote but can still live in a huge home with a pool (Winnie Mandela). It's OK just as long as you pretend everything is OK.

Wonder why SA needed so many border guards to keep people out?

No color is the real reason we opposed them, though the whites had no where to go and had been there as long as we have been in America.

54 posted on 08/22/2006 7:30:39 PM PDT by TWfromTEXAS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson