To: Mojave
I reject your #1, the opinion indicates the money was bundled in groupings consistent with the number of folks who contributed money to the purchase of the vehicle and the amount they contributed. I reject your #4 in that we know he didn't have a credit card to rent a car with, so he had to have also paid cash for the plane ticket.
I can assume all kinds of things based on the facts presented here, but nothing was proved, taking them together no more makes it a fact that this money was drug money than taking them separately.
The asset forfeiture guidelines are a joke and are routinely abused IMO.
To: thinkthenpost
I reject your #1, the opinion indicates the money was bundled in groupings consistent with the number of folks who contributed money to the purchase of the vehicle and the amount they contributed. There was no truck.
I reject your #4 in that we know he didn't have a credit card to rent a car with, so he had to have also paid cash for the plane ticket.
We don't know that. He claimed to have no friends with credit cards to rent a car on the trip out, but he was in a rented vehicle for the trip back.
Care to explain?
323 posted on
08/25/2006 9:40:21 PM PDT by
Mojave
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson