Posted on 08/20/2006 12:43:56 PM PDT by BulletBobCo
This wako freak is on the high point of his life. He's been abusing little kids for a long time and he is narscissitic enough to try to take credit for this murder. He might have done it. Regardless, he needs to be put in a box for the rest of his life.
How does Karr explain the alibi his wife offered for the day of the murder?
He can't.
Everyone, even crazy folks take pictures with their kids on Christmas morning.
Well, at least he's giving the boys and girls in the MSM something new to huff and puff about. This kind of stuff really blows their skirts up.
Johnson or Karr?
I saw the press conference by the DA. She may be hauling him back to question him because he had information he shouldn't have had. I think she needs to interrogate him here. If he knows something, let it come out. I doubt he is the murderer, but hey, let justice takes it's course.
The crux of the problem. Was Mary Lacy trying to make sure he was off the streets?
Yeah? Well I like Jerry Lee Lewis!
Listen up men. Mary Lacy says she has the case all sewn up. The Bang Cock Cops got our man. We will pick him up at the airport.
This is what happens when bad reporting is repeated and uncorrobarated. First, the "facts" of the confession to Thai authorities are in dispute. The statement regarding picking the child victim up from school was one example. A Thai interrogator now claims that that "fact" was added from his own recollection of a TV documentary, not the arrested's. The only fact that isn't subject to poor journalism (and that I will believe) is whether the DNA from the suspect matches that taken from the crime scene and which does not match any other known person. Otherwise this is just bad reporting compounded by ill-founded conjecture.
If he's found to be not "the guy", I hope they send him back to the Bangkok jail to finish out his time rather than puttin in some American "country club" of a jail!
The authorities have made him into a celebrity. First class treatment on his flight. What crap Just for the MSM.
I can't recall where I was X-mas 2006 for that matter.
I don't find her claim very compelling. She has no evidence to back it up, and memories can fade after 10 years.
She does have a motive to remember in his favor--her children. How many women want their children to live with the stigma of having their father known as a notorious child molester/murderer?
I can't stand my ex-husband and think he's pretty vile (but not this vile!) However, most women would remember any Christmases that their husband was not with them and children. I can vividly remember Christmas of '96- we spent Christmas Eve at the grandma-in-laws and announced we were expecting child #2. Former brother-in-law and wife were divorcing but hadn't told anyone but us, yet, so they didn't ruin Christmas. I can even remember a couple of my gifts. ; ) Ex-husband was with me all the next day, also. A lot of women remember holidays, especially when they have kids ages to milestone. And unless it is common for their husband to skip holidays, they remember those where the husband was gone. (I still remember the only Thanksgiving my dad missed when I was a kid.)
That woman who shotgunned her husband and confessed is walking around free.
So full of misinformation I don't where to start
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.