Posted on 08/19/2006 1:44:20 PM PDT by Huntress
Mr. Johnson may be onto something. The more Karr talks, the less credible he gets.
The same day this hit the media, Drudge had an article quoting the ex-wife as saying he was in Alabama on the day of the murder.
There were at least three spurious confessions to the Sacco-Vanzetti murders. Of course, at least one of those was probably elicited by a bribe from the defense team . . . so that's not exactly the same situation.
I think there's a good chance this guy is just a loon who is obsessed with the Ramsey murder and has somehow convinced himself that he did it.
The "undisclosed details" thing here won't wash. Too many people were blabbing all sorts of stuff during the initial investigation. I'm sure there were plenty of leaks that never gained any public notice.
That was, in its day, the same sort of wildly notorious crime, only the fascination was with anarchists instead of the kiddie beauty pageant scene.
I still haven't heard any explanation of what reason they have to believe that he was in boulder that day. To be fair I haven't been following this though, anybody have info or a theory?
Early reports said he knew things that only the killer would know, but they never said what those were.
Need todays article in the SF Chronical. Ex-wife is now changing her story. Now she says he was with here the day after Christmas.
http://sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?file=/c/a/2006/08/19/MNGICKLEUC1.DTL
One Question:
Why not arrest the guy, bring him here...doo the due dilligence and check out the whole story, including DNA..and then, announce this to the Press?
why does this guy remind me of pee-wee herman, also some kind of pervert....
Once again Boulder police are incompetent in following up on a lead given by another city on this Karr guy...in 2001 !
wonder how many unsolved crimes there are out there just because someone" didn't get back to us."
AND JUST WHO'S "PRESS" ARE WE TALKING ABOUT? stop and think about what you just wrote and apply it to any other scoop du-jour
< do I need a /sarcasm tag? >
What you said.
That is very misleading. The article says she is checking everything she can to see if he spent "the day after Christmas" with her.
JonBenet was killed during the overnight hours between Christmas Day, December 25, and the day after, December 26. Her body was "found" on December 26, but coroner's reports estimated that she may have been killed as early as sometime before midnight on Christmas night, December 25.
It has always been a bone of contention that the Ramseys put her death date on her tombstone as December 25, 1996, when they "allegedly" didn't know the exact date of death. They just *liked* using the Christmas date (as John said, "to remind the world" of the day the world went nuts, or something to that effect).
So, if Rains, Lara Knutson Karr's attorney, has instructed her to look for receipts or pix relating to December 26, that is a problem. I wonder who told him that date - Mary Keenan Lacy? Hmmm.
I'm afraid she is being led on a wild goose chase about this. Everyone is, but especially about this crucial mistaken detail.
What was I thinking???!!! I was being rational...how silly. After all I was talking about the $$$$ Media.
I've often wondered if the conviction and execution of Sacco and Vanzetti marked the beginnings of Massachusetts' leftward lurch. It's hard to believe now that Calvin Coolidge was ever the state's governor.
If this is true, this is going to make a lot of people on another forum very upset.
The first time they asked her, it was kind of an ambush by a TV reporter and Lara answered off-the-cuff, from behind her front door, which was just partially opened.
She said she didn't recall any Christmases spent apart from the time they married in 1989 until they separated in 2001. They lived in AL at the time and she has since said that they were dirt poor. The assumption was that he couldn't just jump on a plane and fly to Boulder, much less without her and/or the children, ages 5,4,3 at the time,knowing.
People took that as an alibi. Then the media interviewed one of his brothers, Nate, in Atlanta, who said he thought the whole family was together in Atlanta, where Nate and JMK's father both live, as they always were.
So, people started questioning whether John Mark Karr was in Alabama or in Atlanta on Christmas Day, 1996.
Lara got an attorney and he has been her spokesperson ever since. He's not all that briefed on the JBR case, so he's going to say things that might not gibe with what case-followers would expect. (Poor guy!)
Personally, I don't care whether they were all in Alabama or in Atlanta. I just hope there is some kind of proof that he was there. And that they aren't misled into thinking that December 26, when JBR's body was found, is the actual date of death.
Hours might be crucial here and Lin Wood is bound to make more big deals about the Atlanta confluence, too - which really doesn't relate to anything at all, except him - and to John Andrew's alibi.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.