Very interesting read with video at the link.
Lots of past cases may be tossed and guilty perps let go because of these bad apples.
Now they will attempt to outlaw citizen video survelliance. Can't be embarrassing our masters now can we?
As in the Duke case, there appears to be grounds for Federal criminal and civil prosecutions for Violations of Rights Under Color of Authority. If this case doesn't qualify, I don't know what does. This begins with a false arrest in which the participating sworn officers knew, or should have known, that the "evidence" that was "gathered" was faulty or simply didn't exist. That smells of conspiracy. Then, when the officers discovered their "mistake," there was a further conspiracy to break in and steal the evidence. They should have cut their losses and admitted a "mistake" and the city should have quietly settled. Not giving any advice or anything, but some people need to be thinking about taking the best deal they can get.
wow a cop lying, I am shocked!