Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Why Castroism will die with Castro
Firmas Press ^ | August 17, 2006 | Carlos Alberto Montaner

Posted on 08/19/2006 11:05:53 AM PDT by billorites

With Fidel Castro at age 80, ill and close to death, the essential factor is not when he will disappear but what will happen afterward. Will the dictatorship remain in place without the Comandante? Probably not; all the conditions are there for a change to begin. Here I list eight very important ones.

With his ponderous weight, Fidel Castro has crushed all the institutions in the country. The Communist Party is a hollow shell, inhabited by automatons who decades ago lost their devotion and revolutionary mystique. The National Assembly of the People's Power (Parliament), known as “The Havana Boys Choir,” is a parrot cage where a discordant note has never been heard. The mass organizations (labor unions, women's and students' federations, etc.) represent not its members but the political police that controls them.

The leading class is totally demoralized and secretly desires profound changes. As intelligent people, after all, and after half a century of a failed exercise of power, the people at the top know they defend a universally detested cause. That's what they hear from their children, siblings and spouses in the privacy of their homes. Many of their relatives have left because they can't stand such a disastrous regime. The leaders know that today they are not the protagonists of a heroic feat, as they saw themselves at the start of the revolution, but the inept managers of a hated and feared dictatorship.

Half a century of material failure is far too long a period. Authoritarian collectivism has plunged Cuba into misery. Despite having in his hands all the strings of power, the longest government in the history of the West has turned into martyrdom the most basic problems of society: drinking water, food, housing, transportation, electricity and communications. Simultaneously, it has accomplished the amazing countermiracle of decimating Cuba's centenary sugar industry to the point that its production levels today are those of 1905.

The “achievements” of the revolution have become the grimmest evidence yet against the system, as well as a source of frustration. How is it possible that an educated and healthy population lives in such a miserable manner? Didn't we agree that human capital is the key to prosperity? Why does that arbitrary and dogmatic State, clinging stubbornly to an absurd system, prevent Cubans from creating wealth with their labor and enjoying the fruits of their labor? There is no one more dissatisfied and desirous of changes than an engineer, a woman doctor or a teacher needlessly sentenced to poverty and an absence of hope.

Cuba, situated in the heart of the free world, cannot remain permanently as the anachronistic exception of a utopia that was buried more than 15 years ago. Communism was a 20th-Century nightmare that left 100 million dead and a third of the planet mired in poverty and terror. The Cubans (including pro-Castro Cubans) are not unaware that all of Eastern Europe today is happier and more prosperous than before 1989, a fact that is proven by the scant support for old-line Stalinists at the ballot box. They also know that the Chinese and the Vietnamese are rapidly distancing themselves from the Marxist superstitions and are reviving the market and private property.

There is life beyond communism. The Cuban “revolutionaries” not only have all the incentives needed to change but also have learned that the old communists -- unless guilty of horrendous crimes -- can be recycled within democratic political structures, as has happened in Poland, Slovenia and Russia, and remain in power or regain it via the ballot box and popular support, as long as they respect the freedoms. They already know that the end of the dictatorship does not mean a personal catastrophe for them but the start of a new and promising stage.

A democratic opposition exists, inside Cuba and abroad, that can be a partner to transition. With the passing of years, the pain and the experience, a democratic opposition has developed inside Cuba and abroad that, once Fidel Castro disappears, is willing to foster a peaceful transition to freedom, working out conditions and timetables with the reform-minded sectors of government.

The United States does not wish to annex Cuba, but to contribute copiously so a democratic government and an economic system capable of generating a growing prosperity can be installed in Cuba. All Cubans know -- and that's a great incentive to stimulate transition -- that the United States will contribute its economic might to stabilize the situation on the island and make Cubans see an immediate, substantial improvement in their standard of living, so they may be discouraged from emigrating illegally to the United States. With democracy, economic freedom and the rule of law, in the course of one generation Cuba will stand -- along with Chile, Argentina and Uruguay -- at the head of Latin America, as it did before 1959. [©FIRMAS PRESS]

August 17, 2006


TOPICS: Cuba; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: castro; castrowatch; communists; deathwatch; dictators; raul
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-40 last
To: Sonny M; billorites
The transfer of power from Fidel to Raul was much publicized but I haven't heard (officially) of the transfer back. Just saw pics of Fidel in his Addidas play clothes holding an unpublished newspaper.
21 posted on 08/19/2006 11:38:03 AM PDT by BIGLOOK (Keelhauling is a sensible solution to mutiny.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Bonaparte

Exactly. Montaner and many other people are wrong to regard either socialism or dictatorship as an anachronism. They are more accurately described as permanent temptations. I'm inclined to think that both will always be with us, and I'm absolutely certain that both will always be live possibilities. The only thing that can really be considered anachronistic is certain styles of dictatorship and socialism. But then, certain styles of clothing become anachronistic too. Doesn't mean much.


22 posted on 08/19/2006 11:38:14 AM PDT by California Patriot ("That's not Charlie the Tuna out there. It's Jaws." -- Richard Nixon)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: preacher

It is widely recognized, but not in a vivid way. While few believe in communism, most people don't regard it with the hatred it deserves, know where it came from or more than the sketchiest details of what it did, or know how to deal with it. And that's a problem.


23 posted on 08/19/2006 11:41:07 AM PDT by California Patriot ("That's not Charlie the Tuna out there. It's Jaws." -- Richard Nixon)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: BIGLOOK
Just saw pics of Fidel in his Addidas play clothes holding an unpublished newspaper.

I wouldn't factor in that newspaper thing, that newspaper is state owned, so the pic isn't credible.

As far as I can tell, Raul is still officially in charge.

24 posted on 08/19/2006 11:41:15 AM PDT by Sonny M ("oderint dum metuant")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Sonny M
The big lie was that the USSR would be ruled by "worker's soviets", i.e. committees. It became a one-man state as soon as lenin consolidated his power, and stalin completed the transition to fascism, or "cult of personality". After stalin's death, it reverted somewhat to rule by committee, which is how kruschev was overthrown without bloodshed. By the end, the rulers were a succession of dying old men, and when the bureaucrat gorby attempted some small reforms, the house of cards collapsed.

Cuba is more analogous to Franco's Spain.
25 posted on 08/19/2006 11:43:49 AM PDT by ozzymandus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: billorites
The difference between Eastern Europe and Cuba is Communism was imposed by Soviet tanks there and was perceived as the instrument of a foreign power. In Cuba, it arose through a home-grown revolution and is seen as a nationalist bulwark against American designs on the island. For that reason, Communism is going to have a longer stay in Cuba. The country might become more like China or Vietnam but the ruling class has no reason to cede power.

(No more Olmert! No more Kadima! No more Oslo!)

26 posted on 08/19/2006 11:47:51 AM PDT by goldstategop (In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives On In My Heart Forever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sonny M
The Cuban Revolution isn't even 50 years old. As long as the regime believes the people will be quiescent, there is little incentive for them to change. In totalitarian societies, the ruling oligarchy usually doesn't pay attention to the people, unless their rule is threatened. And Cuba is not burdened with the problems of empire and they get subsidies from Venezuela. The Revolution will around a long while yet.

(No more Olmert! No more Kadima! No more Oslo!)

27 posted on 08/19/2006 11:53:05 AM PDT by goldstategop (In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives On In My Heart Forever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: goldstategop

Yes, and I would add one other point. Cubans, or most of the ones who remain there, are third-worlders. In Eastern and Central Europe, communism contrasted starkly with an older and better civilization. It is no accident, I think, that while Eastern and Central Europe threw off communism, no non-European country truly has, even though it's clearly decayed in China and Vietnam.


28 posted on 08/19/2006 11:56:39 AM PDT by California Patriot ("That's not Charlie the Tuna out there. It's Jaws." -- Richard Nixon)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: ozzymandus
Cuba is more analogous to Franco's Spain.

Perhaps, but by design, they are modeled after the Soviets.

It just happens that Castro has lived a long time, and his lunatic evil sibling handles the bloodshed in a more low key but hands on way.

FWIW, the cubans I know who came over, were always being given the state line BS that everything was being run by committees and the people, no one was stupid enough to believe it, but Cuba makes a strong effort to claim they are run by "workers".

Sidenote: Raul Castro was also the mentor (not Fidel) to Che Guerrura and was the first castro to join up with the communists. Raul introduced his protege Che to Fidel, and the rest is history.

29 posted on 08/19/2006 12:00:56 PM PDT by Sonny M ("oderint dum metuant")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: California Patriot
The Communists in China, Vietnam and Cuba led nationalist revolutions. In North Korea, Communism was imposed by the Soviets but North Koreans have never been able to directly compare their lives with that of their neighbors, so tight has the party's control been over what people can hear, see and read in that country.

(No more Olmert! No more Kadima! No more Oslo!)

30 posted on 08/19/2006 12:04:47 PM PDT by goldstategop (In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives On In My Heart Forever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Sonny M
Cuban Communism was unorthodox. The band of guerrillas who seized power moved in an anarchistic way forward to a Communist state and they rejected the typical Marxist philosophy of rule by the party for the rule of a charismatic strongman. The party is powerful in Cuba but Fidel has the final word.

(No more Olmert! No more Kadima! No more Oslo!)

31 posted on 08/19/2006 12:08:31 PM PDT by goldstategop (In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives On In My Heart Forever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: billorites
"The National Assembly of the People's Power (Parliament)...is a parrot cage"

Sounds like the American newsmedia.

32 posted on 08/19/2006 12:09:22 PM PDT by Savage Beast (9/11 was never repeated--thanks to President George Bush.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: billorites

Castro was/is a fanatic who was willing to let his country die if that meant he could hurt the United States. His crowd had more in common with Hezbollah than the more pragmatic Russian communists of Khruchchev's government.
When the Russian leader realized he was allied with a crazy man, he quickly cut a deal with Kennedy.


33 posted on 08/19/2006 12:12:51 PM PDT by RobbyS ( CHIRHO)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CAWats
Let's hope Islam stays out of Cuba.

Let's hope Venezuela stays out of Cuba, too.

34 posted on 08/19/2006 12:29:30 PM PDT by Right Wing Assault ("..this administration is planning a 'Right Wing Assault' on values and ideals.." - John Kerry)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Right Wing Assault

Let's hope Venezuela stays out of Cuba, too.

No way Chavez is going to do that.


35 posted on 08/19/2006 1:12:50 PM PDT by sasportas
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: billorites
Image hosted by Photobucket.com cause it's just a cult of personality...
36 posted on 08/19/2006 2:17:40 PM PDT by Chode (American Hedonist ©®)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: billorites

I look forward to "opening the books" on Cuban military/intelligence activities. I suspect we'll find a lot about it that's fascinating, particularly as it pertains to the Cuban Missile Crisis and assassination of JFK.


37 posted on 08/19/2006 2:19:18 PM PDT by Zack Nguyen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Zack Nguyen

You must be planning to live for a long time.


38 posted on 08/19/2006 2:30:54 PM PDT by California Patriot ("That's not Charlie the Tuna out there. It's Jaws." -- Richard Nixon)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: sasportas

If Chavez tries to take over Cuba, I predict it will be his undoing. Might even be worth it if he does, just to see him sink into the quick sand.


39 posted on 08/19/2006 2:32:06 PM PDT by Brilliant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: Zack Nguyen

Are you going to look for a secret UFO base too?


40 posted on 08/19/2006 2:37:54 PM PDT by Shooter 2.5 (Vote a Straight Republican Ballot. Rid the country of dems. NRA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-40 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson