Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Roccus

It's my understanding that what today is called the BMI is NOT BMI. My recollection is that BMI was developed as a more precise measurement of fitness than the height and weight tables. My first exposure to the concept was Dr. Kenneth Cooper's book and his explanation of how he measured it by immersing the patient in a tank of water. And I believe the point of this procedure was because it WASN'T POSSIBLE to determine a person's BMI from their height and weight. Over time, people looked for an easier way to approximate BMI without water immersion and "pinch" tests became common (the fat fold on the stomach, back, or arm). Today they use height-weight tables to calculate BMI which makes absolutely no sense to my understanding and memory of the concept. Am I suffering from false memory syndrome?


17 posted on 08/19/2006 8:15:24 PM PDT by rbudd
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]


To: rbudd

You know much more of the science of this than I, evidently. The immersion you mention reminds me of how specific gravity is measured.
The opinions I have stated above are more from observations of the political consequences that result from what to me, were arbitrary changes in the criteria of obesity. I was looking more at the socio-political-economic side rather than the health side. The sudden "epidemic" of obesity was more manufactured than factual IMO.


18 posted on 08/19/2006 8:38:49 PM PDT by Roccus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson