Ok, you have me there. Of course you had to change frames of reference to do it. But indeed, there are a lot of YEC who believe that multple frames of reference could explain how stars were created on the fourth day yet appear to be very old at least from a starlight distance calculation.
Therefore, I concede that I have no way of knowing if the original author who clearly believes in evolution of galaxies, believes in biological evolution. And therefore labeling him an "evolutionist" is misleading, as I agree that the term "evolutionist" is commonly related to biological and not stellar evolution.
No concession needed... just a misunderstanding, that's all. Hope you had a good weekend.