Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Bush warns North Korea not to pursue nuclear testing
Yahoo News via AFP ^ | 08/18/2006 | AFP

Posted on 08/18/2006 5:54:55 PM PDT by garbageseeker

CAMP DAVID, United States (AFP) - US President George W. Bush warned North Korea against nuclear testing but would not say whether he had information confirming that preparations for such a test were under way.

"It's a hypothetical question," Bush told reporters. "And you're asking me to divulge intelligence information I have. I'm not going to do that, as you know."

But he added: "If North Korea were to conduct a test, it's just a constant reminder for people in the neighborhood, in particular, that North Korea poses a threat."

The US television network ABC reported on Thursday that North Korea may be preparing to conduct an underground test of a nuclear bomb.

"It is the view of the intelligence community that a test is real possibility," the network quoted a senior US State Department official as saying.

A senior military official told ABC that an unidentified US intelligence agency had recently observed "suspicious vehicle movement" at a suspected North Korean test site.

The activity included the unloading of large reels of cable outside an underground facility called Pungyee-yok in northeast North Korea, it said.

ABC said cables can be used in nuclear testing to connect an underground test site to observation equipment.

It said the intelligence had been brought to the attention of the White House last week but cautioned that it was "not conclusive."

An imminent nuclear test was predicted in North Korea last year but no test occurred.

ABC said underground nuclear tests are "notoriously difficult" to detect ahead of time and noted that the United States had failed to predict nuclear tests by India and Pakistan in 1998.

North Korea claims to have built nuclear weapons and sparked international alarm last month by test-firing seven ballistic missiles.

In Huntsville, Alabama on Tuesday the head of the US missile defense agency said he expects to make recommendations in a matter of months on where to position interceptor missiles and radar in Europe to best protect against the threat of Iranian missiles.

The European site would be the first expansion outside of the United States of an unproven US missile defense system that currently is aimed at thwarting a limited long-range missile attack by North Korea.

"We are facing a real threat," General Henry Obering said in a speech in Huntsville. "It is one that is growing. It is one that I consider to be one of the preeminent threats we'll face in the 21st century."

Obering's comments came just weeks after North Korea test fired a long-range Taepo-dong 2 missile and six shorter range Nodong and Scud-type missiles.

Although the long-range missile test failed early in flight, the others were successful.

"And so we have to be careful that we don't jump to the wrong conclusions about it. Even though they had a failure in a long range test does not mean they don't have capability," Obering said.


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; Front Page News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: atomic; atomictesting; august22; axisofevil; dprk; geopolitics; kimjongil; nk; nknukes; northkorea; nuclear; nucleartesting; nukes; proliferation; pyongyang; wmd
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-62 next last
To: diverteach
try this ah......ma.......dinny.......jad Hooked on phonics works for me! but if you said "Allformyjihad" we'll know what you mean. LOL

Now THAT I can wrap my mind around. LOL Reminds me though of a t-shirt our son bought years ago that said, "hukt on fonnex wrkd 4 me". Something like that. :)

41 posted on 08/18/2006 7:49:17 PM PDT by Chena ("I'm not young enough to know everything." (Oscar Wilde))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: uptoolate
I like the way Savage pronounced his name....A-mad-jihad.

LOL

42 posted on 08/18/2006 7:50:02 PM PDT by Chena ("I'm not young enough to know everything." (Oscar Wilde))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: garbageseeker; Wiggins; All

check this out: http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/1686262/posts?page=1


43 posted on 08/18/2006 7:54:38 PM PDT by Chena ("I'm not young enough to know everything." (Oscar Wilde))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: garbageseeker

And where would the two USN Tridents be situated on this map?

F


44 posted on 08/18/2006 7:56:26 PM PDT by Frank Sheed (Tá brón orainn. Níl Spáinnis againn anseo.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: garbageseeker
Kim will do it. He is crazy enough.

Yea, he is. Just hope he isn't crazy enough to run the test over Seoul or Tokyo.

45 posted on 08/18/2006 8:28:57 PM PDT by El Gato
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: garbageseeker
You're right about that

Of course 5 days after NK's successfully testing an atomic nuke Japan is going to be a new thermonuclear power with warheads sitting on top of ICBMs.

46 posted on 08/18/2006 8:37:13 PM PDT by Centurion2000 (Islam is a subsingularity memetic perversion : (http://www.orionsarm.com/topics/perversities.html))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Frank Sheed
And where would the two USN Tridents be situated on this map?

A couple of hundred miles from the entrance to the Straits of Juan de Fuca? Doesn't really matter where they are, they can hit Little Kim right in his A$$.

47 posted on 08/18/2006 8:39:49 PM PDT by El Gato
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: garbageseeker
They have new bank accounts in 27 places, none willing to listen to us, and Iran is willing to pay them a smidgen of their $70 oil gusher ($100 billion a year, folks). They don't care a lick about our economic sanctions.
48 posted on 08/18/2006 8:50:27 PM PDT by JasonC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Frank Sheed

Somewhere in the North and South Pacific. That is their "supposed" cruising areas. They are usually within 15 minutes strike time to their targets on the Asian continent.


49 posted on 08/18/2006 9:01:53 PM PDT by garbageseeker (Wars may be fought by weapons, but they are won by men.- General George Patton)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: Centurion2000

I agree. Japan already has the technology and the rockets to accomplish that virually overnight. I will include South Korea and Taiwan. to become nuclear powers.


50 posted on 08/18/2006 9:05:21 PM PDT by garbageseeker (Wars may be fought by weapons, but they are won by men.- General George Patton)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: garbageseeker
Who cares, it is their land, they can do what they want. And we can use this as leverage against China and Russia; and we can give the thumbs up to a more militarized Japan; and we can emphasize our importance to a bunch of sniveling worthless, South Korean youth.
51 posted on 08/18/2006 9:09:30 PM PDT by Porterville (Hispanic Republican American Bush Supporter)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Porterville

I agree. We need to start thinking of giving Japan back some of the military powers the lost in 1945 to counter the growing NK menace.


52 posted on 08/18/2006 9:14:43 PM PDT by garbageseeker (Wars may be fought by weapons, but they are won by men.- General George Patton)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: Chena

Here we go.

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/1686262/posts?page=1


53 posted on 08/18/2006 9:48:21 PM PDT by Wiggins
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: garbageseeker

Let 'em test it.....Let the world see what Klinton and Al-Bright has wrought with their policy of appeasement.....


54 posted on 08/19/2006 6:36:04 AM PDT by blasater1960 ( Ishmaelites...Still a wild-ass of a people....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: garbageseeker

And we will do what?


55 posted on 08/19/2006 1:20:33 PM PDT by redgolum ("God is dead" -- Nietzsche. "Nietzsche is dead" -- God.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blasater1960
what appeasement?


56 posted on 08/19/2006 1:24:44 PM PDT by petercooper (Is this where I get me a huntin' license?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: TigerLikesRooster
Any speculation about what "people in the neighborhood" will do about it?

BTW, what inspired you to choose your screen name?

57 posted on 08/19/2006 1:28:15 PM PDT by OKSooner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: garbageseeker
it's just a constant reminder

A reminder that the Korean War is in a state of suspension only and could pick up where it left off at any time.

58 posted on 08/19/2006 1:29:59 PM PDT by RightWhale (Repeal the law of the excluded middle)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RightWhale
You are absolutely correct. There is no formal peace agreement with North Korea only an armistice which was signed in 1953.Technically, we are still at war with North Korea.
59 posted on 08/19/2006 1:52:49 PM PDT by garbageseeker (Wars may be fought by weapons, but they are won by men.- General George Patton)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: garbageseeker
I agree. We need to start thinking of giving Japan back some of the military powers the lost in 1945 to counter the growing NK menace.

We're still footing most of the bill for Japan's defense, althought the Self Defense Force could easily be fleshed out into a top of the line military.

Disarming Japan made sense 60 years ago, but times have changed. They're being threatened by the North Koreans, and they need options that extend past asking Uncle Sam for help. Plus, without Japan as a counterweight to China, the PRC will become as dangerous as Imperial Japan ever was. They are natural competitors, and will help balance out the region, rather than make it an attractive target for Chinese aggression.

60 posted on 08/19/2006 1:59:16 PM PDT by Steel Wolf (- Islam will never survive being laughed at. -)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-62 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson