Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Doe Eyes
I didn't see an interpretation. I saw what you wish it meant. The 4th Amendment is clearly stated. Please provide an interpretation.

No. I told you what it means. "Probable cause" is not a standard for surveilling non-American citizens. There is no standard.

And American citizens talking to these up-to-no-good non-citizens have to be surveilled right along with them.

I will ask again: do you believe terrorists have the protection of the Constitution? And, if you say they should, why should they?

114 posted on 08/18/2006 5:02:50 PM PDT by sinkspur (Today, we settled all family business.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 105 | View Replies ]


To: sinkspur
"Probable cause" is not a standard for surveilling non-American citizens. There is no standard.

Where does this come from? I have not found it in the Constitution.

115 posted on 08/18/2006 5:05:30 PM PDT by Doe Eyes
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 114 | View Replies ]

To: sinkspur
"Probable cause" is not a standard for surveilling non-American citizens.

Before you get too deep in this, search the Constitution for "person" versus "citizen". You will find that the BOR applies to person, not citizens.

120 posted on 08/18/2006 5:10:00 PM PDT by Doe Eyes
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 114 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson