I tell you, these democrats are putting the American people at greater and greater risk. Democrats do not deserve the power they have, let alone the power they seek. I hope no terrorist action occurs within our borders because if it does, most democrat officals will answer directly to the people.
Im so confused.
I thought the constitution was a living and breathing document? Subject to change by current interpretation?
Is Judge Taylor saying that its a rigid, binding contract on printed paper?
Or is it living and breathing, with current interpretation that Foreign based enemies communicating with Americans now have a right to privacy during time of war? No need to Amend the contract, as it is now breathing and pooping with rights for people in Iran.
Did Abe Lincoln know that it was a Living Breathing document? Or was he under the impression that it was a contract between the people and their government, only changing when amended with a democratic process of votes? Didn't he know that congress was in charge of all war time decisions, subject to debate in the senate while the battle field conditions changed?
Maybe Democrats could impeach Abe Lincoln posthumously for dropping Habius Corpus during time of war. He is a republican, and he also should have known that rebels had a right to trials after they burnd northern cities to the ground.
Wow, am I so confused. Head spinning.
The Constitution requires a search warrant to be issued by a judge before search (wiretaps) and seizure.
The Constitution is the Supreme Law of the Land that the executive is sworn to uphold.
Nobody has said the terrorists shouldn't be wiretapped. The issue is solely about obtaining a warrant from a judge. Why is that such a big deal? All the executive needs to wiretap is a warrant from a judge.
This is the 4th amendment:
" The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized."
That is THE LAW, in the United States Constitution. You are UNAMERICAN if you do not defend and uphold this amendment.
The Constitution requires a search warrant to be issued by a judge before search (wiretaps) and seizure.
The Constitution is the Supreme Law of the Land that the executive is sworn to uphold.
Nobody has said the terrorists shouldn't be wiretapped. The issue is solely about obtaining a warrant from a judge. Why is that such a big deal? All the executive needs to wiretap is a warrant from a judge.
This is the 4th amendment:
" The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized."
That is THE LAW, in the United States Constitution. You are UNAMERICAN if you do not defend and uphold this amendment.