To: Clint N. Suhks
I expect both of President Bush's Supreme Court appointees to abstain if the NSA case gets that far. If this is the case, the USSC might not be a win for the administration.
566 posted on
08/18/2006 12:11:31 PM PDT by
Ingtar
(Prensa dos para el inglés)
To: Ingtar
I expect both of President Bush's Supreme Court appointees to abstain if the NSA case gets that far. I There's NO reason for them to abstain. Roberts had to abstain in Hamdan v. Rumseld because he had WRITTEN the opinion on the circuit court, that's a clear conflict. Neither Alito or Roberts have ruled or taken part in the NSA deliberations and therefore do NOT have to recuse themselves.
569 posted on
08/18/2006 12:14:52 PM PDT by
LibertyLee
(George W. Bush a Great President--US out of the UN and US out of the UN!)
To: Ingtar
expect both of President Bush's Supreme Court appointees to abstain if the NSA Nope only have to sit out cases they have all ready ruled on. This is a new case so they do NOT have to sit it out since the SC hearing would be the 1st they heard THIS case.
575 posted on
08/18/2006 12:28:54 PM PDT by
MNJohnnie
(History shows us that if you are not willing to fight, you better be prepared to die)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson