Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Clint N. Suhks

I expect both of President Bush's Supreme Court appointees to abstain if the NSA case gets that far. If this is the case, the USSC might not be a win for the administration.


566 posted on 08/18/2006 12:11:31 PM PDT by Ingtar (Prensa dos para el inglés)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 530 | View Replies ]


To: Ingtar
I expect both of President Bush's Supreme Court appointees to abstain if the NSA case gets that far. I

There's NO reason for them to abstain. Roberts had to abstain in Hamdan v. Rumseld because he had WRITTEN the opinion on the circuit court, that's a clear conflict. Neither Alito or Roberts have ruled or taken part in the NSA deliberations and therefore do NOT have to recuse themselves.

569 posted on 08/18/2006 12:14:52 PM PDT by LibertyLee (George W. Bush a Great President--US out of the UN and US out of the UN!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 566 | View Replies ]

To: Ingtar
expect both of President Bush's Supreme Court appointees to abstain if the NSA

Nope only have to sit out cases they have all ready ruled on. This is a new case so they do NOT have to sit it out since the SC hearing would be the 1st they heard THIS case.

575 posted on 08/18/2006 12:28:54 PM PDT by MNJohnnie (History shows us that if you are not willing to fight, you better be prepared to die)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 566 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson