The ruling is bad, stands opposed by precedent, five previous cases in fact, and it just gives more ammunition to the conservatives like us that always say that liberal activist Judges have to be replaced and that liberals do not protect us from terrorism and are more pre-occupied with incorrectly perceived violations of ficticious civil rights, than protecting the counry. This willbe a bad backlash for the liberals in the end, and it will all happen before the election.
I agree with you, but it won't play out like that in the press. It will be back to The "President's controversial warantless domestic eavesdropping program."
You watch.