You win the most condescending post of the day - Implying that I disagree because of lack of faith in Christ is the furthest thing from the truth - but then discernment might not be your gift - which is why you fall for the "sky is falling" routine.
You misread my intent.
The people who base their decisions against believers in the Fifth Court case are exercising a lack of faith in Christ, the same as those who enforce regulations against believers in China.
One can live through faith in Christ, while respecting the legitimate authority inherant in divinely established institutions, such as national governance.
The court case manifests a lack of respect for the faith in Christ in all things, as exercised by believers. In so doing IMHO, violates the Constitution by attacking the believer's worship.