[Woodman]

That's one of those unsourced "facts" that sounds so true that it sets off the BS meter. It would be nice to know how it was found, in the open, hidden, or possibly weatherproofed and buried.

I think that the odds are it is true especially if it was well hidden. I don't think they would just run out into the woods and chuck it while the hammer was coming down. British evidence rules are not the same as ours, so there may be good reasons why they are very tight lipped about what they have. If I remember correctly, it is near impossible to hold someone without proof that they are guilty, because at trial you basically have to prove your innocence. They may continue going back to the judge and asking for extensions until the evidence is overwhelming before officially announcing many of the details.

[sockmonkey]

It would be nice to know how it was found, in the open, hidden, or possibly weatherproofed and buried.

They said on the news a couple of days ago, they were searching the woods near two of the suspects homes because they thought they had been setting off "practice" bombs there.