Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 08/17/2006 3:58:24 PM PDT by new yorker 77
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: new yorker 77

Whatever happened to playing politics with the war on terror? Oh, yeah..that's right. That only applies to Republicans and not jew-hating, hags with more plastic surgery than a hollywood whore.


2 posted on 08/17/2006 4:00:33 PM PDT by The Iceman Cometh (Just another evil conservative)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: new yorker 77
"Now it is time for the President to work with Congress to devise tough, effective, and lawful ways to monitor the communications of suspected terrorists."

The President's forehead has a permanent dent in it from banging his head against a brick wall having to deal with the likes of Pelosi and Congress
4 posted on 08/17/2006 4:05:27 PM PDT by stm (Good people sleep peaceably in their beds at night only because rough men stand ready to do violence)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: new yorker 77

From the lefties at Mojowire:

Of course the bloodless ghouls of Freeperville (sorry, I don't have the emotional energy to link there) have completely spun out...

I think they are over their cognitive dissonance and have finally embraced their fascist leanings, openly saying that the Preznit should just ignore the court, under the rubric of "Oh yeah? Well, who's gonna make us stop? You?"

That and of course, that the court is actually in support of terrorism, so anything they say should not count...


http://mojowire.blogspot.com/


5 posted on 08/17/2006 4:05:27 PM PDT by TheRobb7 (http://HeartofAmerica.bravehost.com....Interactive for Conservatives)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: new yorker 77
I recall "stretch" touting what the Brits did to nix the latest terrorist plot to take down trans-Atlantic flights bound for the U.S.

If memory serves, the UK's security/surveilance capability allows for easier tracking of the bad guys.

Stretch... wounder how'd you feel if a terrorist cell was successful in taking down as San Fran. landmark like the Golden Gate Bridge, but could have been prevented by NSA's monitoring of calls? We're trying to connect the dots, but you don't want to allow it. If Cali gets hit (and hit hard) you've got no one to blame but yourself and you're like-minded "friends." And no, do not attempt to place blame on the Bush Administration for making people mad at the U.S. for doing what we said we're going to do - take out the bad guys/gals before they get a chance to do their dirty work.

6 posted on 08/17/2006 4:08:22 PM PDT by Trajan88 (www.bullittclub.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: new yorker 77

is this the same pelosi that complimented the brits on breakin up the airline plot using wire-taps, fund transfer traces and other means to find and keep an eye on the perps?? the same pelosi that is now slammin W when he tries to do the same thing but less?? (the brits have more authority than we do I believe to achieve this??)


7 posted on 08/17/2006 4:08:40 PM PDT by GeorgiaDawg32 (I'm a Patriot Guard Rider..www.patriotguard.org for info)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: new yorker 77
Skip to comments.

DFU SONG: Put on a Happy Face (Pelosi, put on a burqa)
DFU SONG PARODIES | 1-2003 | Lyrics, Doug from Upland

Posted on 01/28/2003 12:59:59 PM PST by doug from upland

MIDI - PUT ON A HAPPY FACE

Nancy Pelosi, we plead…put on a burqa, please
Appeasement has been your creed…put on a burqa please

You show it every time how much you loathe…the USA
Please climb up on that Golden Gate you've got…and fly away

You're a RAT, you're a liar…put on a burqa, please
Dear, your pants are on fire…put on a burqa, please

Like all the libs you are so filled with sleaze
Just put on a burqa, please

You're in the weasel axis…put on a burqa, please
First thought is raise our taxes…put on a burqa, please

You show it every time how much you loathe…the USA
Please climb up on that Golden Gate you've got…and fly away

You may say we are right wing…put on a burqa, please
But we say you are frightening…put on a burqa, please

Like all the libs you are so filled with sleaze
Just put on a burqa, please

8 posted on 08/17/2006 4:09:26 PM PDT by doug from upland (Stopping Hillary should be a FreeRepublic Manhattan Project)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: new yorker 77

Hey, I know. Why don't we just have the New York Times "devise tough, effective, and lawful ways to monitor the communications of suspected terrorists"? Then they'd be like liberal pre-approved and the President wouldn't have to worry about having these new tough, effective lawful methods exposed in the media and thus rendered impotent.

I just wonder, though. On what planet would monitoring terrorist communications not involve tracing their phone calls and Internet chatter, which is what the NSA already does? Just wondering. Maybe someday Pelosi and her fellow fantasists will let us know.


9 posted on 08/17/2006 4:11:47 PM PDT by Argus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: new yorker 77

Nancy's happy now.By the way now that this option for monitoring terrorism's off the table did she make any suggestions to replace it ???


13 posted on 08/17/2006 4:20:41 PM PDT by Obie Wan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: new yorker 77

***Now it is time for the President to work with Congress to devise tough, effective, and lawful ways to monitor the communications of suspected terrorists." ***

No Nancy: Now is the time for you and the rest of the assholes in Congress to get off the mans back and let him get his job done.


21 posted on 08/17/2006 4:49:38 PM PDT by sgtbono2002 (The fourth estate is a fifth column.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: new yorker 77

For the life of me I don't know why Republicans are not saying dems want to make us less safe and open ourselves to terrorist attacks and say the only reason we haven't been attacked is because of wiretaps and these legal measures President Bush is using to protect us ...


22 posted on 08/17/2006 4:50:02 PM PDT by plain talk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: new yorker 77

24 posted on 08/17/2006 5:23:24 PM PDT by Gritty (The New York Times is the propaganda organ of Manhattan’s Upper West Side - Rabbi Aryeh Spero)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: new yorker 77
Pelosi is just an ugly barfly.
25 posted on 08/17/2006 6:51:28 PM PDT by tobyhill (The War on Terrorism is not for the weak.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: new yorker 77
Repudiation my foot. Her decision reads like it was written by a wild eyed liberal blogger. 

26 posted on 08/17/2006 6:54:11 PM PDT by HawaiianGecko (Timing has a lot to do with the outcome of a rain dance.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: new yorker 77
Good.
She's now on record supporting a decision to extend 1st & 4th amendment protections to communication with known terrorists.

From the the malformed opinion:
...{plaintiffs} must also communicate with individuals abroad whom the United States government believes to be terrorist suspects or to be associated with terrorist organizations, and must discuss confidential information over the phone and email with their international clients.

29 posted on 08/18/2006 9:12:24 AM PDT by TeleStraightShooter (The Right To Take Life is NOT a Constitutional "Liberty" protected by the 14th Amendment)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson