Talk Origins refutation amounts to claiming that it couldn't possibly be right because other evidence points to the earth being old.
"I am unable to locate information regarding your claim of diamond crystal studies. Do you have a reference?
HELIUM DIFFUSION RATES SUPPORT ACCELERATED NUCLEAR DECAY
Nuclear Decay: Evidence For A Young World (#352)
| “Talk.Origins Archive” Rebuttals |  TOP |
- Helium Evidence for a Young Earth (Russ Humphreys)—rebuts Kevin Henke’s sloppy, unaccountable criticisms of the peer-reviewed RATE findings.
- New Helium Evidence for A Young World Overcomes Pressure (Russ Humphreys)—rebuts the second edition of Kevin Henke’s sloppy, unaccountable criticisms of the peer-reviewed RATE findings.
"Do you also have a reference showing that "creationism" predicted the exsitence of polonium halos and diamond crystal propreties before either were discovered?"
Creationists didn't predict the existence of halos before they were discovered, any more than evolutionists predicted that the earth would contain fossils before the first fossils were discovered.
However Creationists did predict that they were a source of information that explain the apparent discrepancy between radiometric dating and the Bible's record of history. To that end, Creation Scientists formed the RATE project with clearly defined research projects and predictions.