But it's not true. De we really need to show the skull pictures again? And again, the magnetic flips are prediction of basic ferromagnetism, not of creationism. (Also, the radioisotope halo and diamond crystal studies, assuming you're talking about what I think you are, are bogus because they don't account for secondary decay products.)
Still waiting for a specific prediction, of creationism that shows what we will find and where we will find it.
Here's another fulfilled prediction of evolutionary science:
"It was predicted that humans must have an intermaxillary bone, since other mammals do. The adult human skull consists of bones that have fused together, so you can't tell one way or the other in an adult. An examination of human embryonic development showed that an intermaxillary bone is one of the things that fuses to become your upper jaw."
You mean the skull pictures that aren't to scale? And that show skull 1470 in it's original reconstruction before it was determined not to have a flat face? The one that shows a modern chimp lined up with ancient australipicenes as though it's some sort of progression? The ones that show Neanderthals as a precurser to Modern Humans even though they are known not to be?
If you want to embarrass yourself go ahead.
It's not the magnetic flip itself, it's the timing of the flip. Evolutionists said they occurred slowly with each flip taking thousands of years.
YE Creationists, reasoned that if the earth wasn't old, then the flips had to have occured much much faster. Thus, they predicted that a record of quickly occuring flip would have been captured in lava. And the prediction was confirmed.