You attempted to use Hitler to discredit Darwin. That was why I used Christianity to show what a stupid argument you were making. The parallel is precise. OK?
The history of life on Earth doesn't depend in any way on what Hitler did or didn't do. And if I'm explaining things to you that I wouldn't have to explain to a bright three-year-old, it's not because I don't have to.
"Coulter does not say, nor does she insinuate, that Darwin is the root cause of historical atrocities. She does point out how those who commit those atrocities are Darwinist. Stalin was a Darwinist. Hitler, who believed in a master race, was...what?"
Then you say:
You attempted to use Hitler to discredit Darwin. That was why I used Christianity to show what a stupid argument you were making. The parallel is precise. OK?
Do you notice how you claim my arguments are stupid? The back side of that statement is that you believe you're intelligent. Yet, while you berate me, you make some ridiculously invalid arguments. If I use Hitler, you can use Christianity? What type of a mind comes up with an excuse like that?
Yours is a case of imprecise precision; Darwinists are known for that. You would profit by reading the last two chapters in Godless, the ones that detail the frauds of the Darwin/Godless religion.
quod erat demonstrandum